[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dp: Use current cdclk for DSC Bigjoiner BW check

Nautiyal, Ankit K ankit.k.nautiyal at intel.com
Tue Apr 4 05:13:21 UTC 2023


On 4/4/2023 3:03 AM, Manasi Navare wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 4:11 AM Nautiyal, Ankit K
> <ankit.k.nautiyal at intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 3/29/2023 5:05 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 05:00:55PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
>>>> On 3/29/2023 4:23 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 04:06:21PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/29/2023 3:27 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 02:14:49PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
>>>>>>>> As per Bspec, Big Joiner BW check is:
>>>>>>>> Output bpp <= PPC * CDCLK frequency * Big joiner interface bits /
>>>>>>>> Pixel clock
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Currently we always use max_cdclk in the check for both modevalid
>>>>>>>> and compute config steps.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> During modevalid use max_cdclk_freq for the check.
>>>>>>>> During compute config step use current cdclk for the check.
>>>>>>> Nak. cdclk is computed much later based on what is actually needed.
>>>>>>> The cdclk freq you are using here is essentially a random number.
>>>>>> Oh I didn't realise that, perhaps I was lucky when I tested this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So this check where CDCLK is mentioned, actually expects max_cdclk_freq?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If it doesnt then, we might have a compressed_bpp value, that might be
>>>>>> violating the big joiner bw check.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Should this be handled while computing cdclk?
>>>>> Yes. I suggest adding something like intel_vdsc_min_cdclk() that
>>>>> handles all of it.
>>>> I can try that out.
>>>>
>>>> Will also add *Pipe BW check*: Pixel clock < PPC * CDCLK frequency *
>>>> Number of pipes joined, which seems to be missing.
>>> That is already accounted for in the pixel rate.
>> Indeed, will club this check and the other bigjoiner_bw check in
>> intel_vdsc_min_cdclk, if the approach mentioned in the other mail is
>> acceptable.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Ankit
> Hi Ankit,
>
> Yes I think it makes sense to add the vdsc_min_cdclk check while
> computing the min cdclk.
> This will hopefully let us exercise all allowed compressed bpps all
> the way to 27, which have caused failures earlier
> possibly due to the cdcclk being reduced beyond the pipe bw required
> with the max compressed bpp that we use.
> So best would be to check against vdsc_mind_cdclk required if dsc is
> enabled for that configuration, if not then skip
> the check
>
> Regards
> Manasi


Right, I will send a new patch with intel_vdsc_min_cdclk as discussed.

Will be good to have further discussion on that.

Thanks & Regards,

Ankit

>>>> So with pipe bw_check cdclk should be >  Pixel clock / (PPC * Number of
>>>> pipes joined)
>>>>
>>>> In addition, as per bigjoiner check it should be >= compressed_bpp /
>>>> (PPC * bigjoiner interface bits).
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Ankit
>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ankit
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal at intel.com>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>      drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c     | 9 ++++++---
>>>>>>>>      drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h     | 1 +
>>>>>>>>      drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 1 +
>>>>>>>>      3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>>>>>>>> index 3fe651a8f5d0..d6600de1ab49 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>>>>>>>> @@ -711,6 +711,7 @@ u32 intel_dp_dsc_nearest_valid_bpp(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u32 bpp, u32 p
>>>>>>>>      u16 intel_dp_dsc_get_output_bpp(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>>>>>>>>                                   u32 link_clock, u32 lane_count,
>>>>>>>>                                   u32 mode_clock, u32 mode_hdisplay,
>>>>>>>> +                                unsigned int cdclk,
>>>>>>>>                                   bool bigjoiner,
>>>>>>>>                                   u32 pipe_bpp,
>>>>>>>>                                   u32 timeslots)
>>>>>>>> @@ -757,9 +758,9 @@ u16 intel_dp_dsc_get_output_bpp(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>           if (bigjoiner) {
>>>>>>>>                   int bigjoiner_interface_bits = DISPLAY_VER(i915) <= 12 ? 24 : 36;
>>>>>>>> -                u32 max_bpp_bigjoiner =
>>>>>>>> -                        i915->display.cdclk.max_cdclk_freq * 2 * bigjoiner_interface_bits /
>>>>>>>> -                        intel_dp_mode_to_fec_clock(mode_clock);
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +                u32 max_bpp_bigjoiner = cdclk * 2 * bigjoiner_interface_bits /
>>>>>>>> +                                        intel_dp_mode_to_fec_clock(mode_clock);
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                   bits_per_pixel = min(bits_per_pixel, max_bpp_bigjoiner);
>>>>>>>>           }
>>>>>>>> @@ -1073,6 +1074,7 @@ intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *_connector,
>>>>>>>>                                                               max_lanes,
>>>>>>>>                                                               target_clock,
>>>>>>>>                                                               mode->hdisplay,
>>>>>>>> +                                                            dev_priv->display.cdclk.max_cdclk_freq,
>>>>>>>>                                                               bigjoiner,
>>>>>>>>                                                               pipe_bpp, 64) >> 4;
>>>>>>>>                           dsc_slice_count =
>>>>>>>> @@ -1580,6 +1582,7 @@ int intel_dp_dsc_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>>>>>>>>                                                               pipe_config->lane_count,
>>>>>>>>                                                               adjusted_mode->crtc_clock,
>>>>>>>>                                                               adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay,
>>>>>>>> +                                                            dev_priv->display.cdclk.hw.cdclk,
>>>>>>>>                                                               pipe_config->bigjoiner_pipes,
>>>>>>>>                                                               pipe_bpp,
>>>>>>>>                                                               timeslots);
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
>>>>>>>> index ef39e4f7a329..d150bfe8abf4 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
>>>>>>>> @@ -106,6 +106,7 @@ int intel_dp_dsc_compute_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u8 dsc_max_bpc);
>>>>>>>>      u16 intel_dp_dsc_get_output_bpp(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>>>>>>>>                                   u32 link_clock, u32 lane_count,
>>>>>>>>                                   u32 mode_clock, u32 mode_hdisplay,
>>>>>>>> +                                unsigned int cdclk,
>>>>>>>>                                   bool bigjoiner,
>>>>>>>>                                   u32 pipe_bpp,
>>>>>>>>                                   u32 timeslots);
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
>>>>>>>> index a860cbc5dbea..266e31b78729 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
>>>>>>>> @@ -925,6 +925,7 @@ intel_dp_mst_mode_valid_ctx(struct drm_connector *connector,
>>>>>>>>                                                               max_lanes,
>>>>>>>>                                                               target_clock,
>>>>>>>>                                                               mode->hdisplay,
>>>>>>>> +                                                            dev_priv->display.cdclk.max_cdclk_freq,
>>>>>>>>                                                               bigjoiner,
>>>>>>>>                                                               pipe_bpp, 64) >> 4;
>>>>>>>>                           dsc_slice_count =
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> 2.25.1


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list