[Intel-gfx] [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Fix comparison in intel_dram.

[Maarten Lankhorst]

Hey,

On 2023-04-03 22:35, Matt Roper wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 12:24:16PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> Gen13 should probably be the same as gen12, not gen11.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_dram.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_dram.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_dram.c
>> index 9f0651d48d41..9649051ed8ed 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_dram.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_dram.c
>> @@ -548,7 +548,7 @@ static int icl_pcode_read_mem_global_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> I don't think we need this change.  We were only reading the this pcode
> mailbox for display purposes, and even on the latest graphics version 12
> platforms we shouldn't make it into this function anymore.  Instead the
> display IP now provides this information itself so there's no need to go
> through the GT's pcode mailbox; we read it directly from display
> registers in xelpdp_get_dram_info().  It looks like this condition here
> would only matter if we had a future platform with graphics version
> higher than 12, but display version lower than 14, which seems very
> unlikely.

Probably not, but it's at least cosmetically more correct. We only need 
the dram code for display, so in theory we could check for display_ver 
 >= 12 instead and have it unified.

If something breaks the pattern, we can fix it then. :)

~Maarten