[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/19] drm/i915/i915_scatterlist: Fix kerneldoc formatting issue - missing '@'

[Lee Jones]

On Tue, 04 Apr 2023, Jani Nikula wrote:

> On Mon, 03 Apr 2023, Lee Jones <lee at kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 03 Apr 2023, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 31 Mar 2023, Lee Jones <lee at kernel.org> wrote:
> >> > Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
> >> >
> >> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scatterlist.c:62: warning: Function parameter or member 'size' not described in 'i915_refct_sgt_init'
> >> >
> >> > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at linux.intel.com>
> >> > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>
> >> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> >> > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com>
> >> > Cc: David Airlie <airlied at gmail.com>
> >> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch>
> >> > Cc: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> >> > Cc: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> >> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee at kernel.org>
> >>
> >> Thanks for the patches!
> >>
> >> Applied all but one of the drm/i915 patches to drm-intel-next or
> >> drm-intel-gt-next depending on the area. There were a couple of issues
> >> that I fixed while applying. There was a conflict with patch 5/19
> >> against drm-intel-gt-next so I left that one out.
> >
> > Thanks Jani.  I'll rebase and see what's left.
>
> We also took notice and aim to track this more aggressively [1].

Thanks.

I did clean-up all of the GPU warnings already a couple of years ago,
but they seem to have crept back over time.  It would be great if we
could put some extra checks in place to prevent them in the future.

My aim, albeit ambitious, is to clean-up all of the W=1 warnings in the
kernel, then have them promoted to W=0, so they warn more loudly during
development, thus keeping them from reappearing.

--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]