[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 6/8] drm/i915/uapi/pxp: Fix UAPI spec comments and add GET_PARAM for PXP

[Lionel Landwerlin]

On 14/04/2023 18:17, Teres Alexis, Alan Previn wrote:
> Hi Lionel, does this patch work for you?


Hi, Sorry for the late answer.

That looks good :


Acked-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com>


Thanks,


-Lionel


>
> On Mon, 2023-04-10 at 10:22 -0700, Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele wrote:
>> On 4/6/2023 10:44 AM, Alan Previn wrote:
> alan:snip
>
>>> +/*
>>> + * Query the status of PXP support in i915.
>>> + *
>>> + * The query can fail in the following scenarios with the listed error codes:
>>> + *  -ENODEV = PXP support is not available on the GPU device or in the kernel
>>> + *            due to missing component drivers or kernel configs.
>>> + * If the IOCTL is successful, the returned parameter will be set to one of the
>>> + * following values:
>>> + *   0 = PXP support maybe available but underlying SOC fusing, BIOS or firmware
>>> + *       configuration is unknown and a PXP-context-creation would be required
>>> + *       for final verification of feature availibility.
>> Would it be useful to add:
>>
>> 1 = PXP support is available
>>
>> And start returning that after we've successfully created our first
>> session? Not sure if userspace would use this though, since they still
>> need to handle the 0 case anyway.
>> I'm also ok with this patch as-is, as long as you get an ack from the
>> userspace drivers for this interface behavior:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com>
>>
>> Daniele
> alan:snip
>