[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Use separate "DC off" power well for ADL-P and DG2

Sripada, Radhakrishna radhakrishna.sripada at intel.com
Thu Apr 20 03:28:08 UTC 2023



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Deak, Imre <imre.deak at intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2023 10:43 AM
> To: Sripada, Radhakrishna <radhakrishna.sripada at intel.com>
> Cc: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org; De Marchi, Lucas
> <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Use separate "DC off" power well
> for ADL-P and DG2
> 
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 01:25:45PM -0700, Radhakrishna Sripada wrote:
> > From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
> >
> > Although ADL-P and DG2 both use the same general power well setup, the
> > DC5/DC6 requirements are slightly different which means each platform
> > should have its own "DC off" power well.
> >
> > DG2 (i.e., Xe_HPD IP) requires that DC5 be disabled whenever PG2 is
> > active.  However ADL-P (i.e., Xe_LPD IP) only requires DC5/DC6 to be
> > disabled when the PGC or PGD subwells are active; we should be able to
> > remain in these DC states when PGB and general PG2 functionality is in
> > use.
> >
> > Bspec: 49193
> > Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  .../i915/display/intel_display_power_map.c    | 41 +++++++++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power_map.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power_map.c
> > index 6645eb1911d8..d9e02cc9cf3c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power_map.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power_map.c
> > @@ -1301,7 +1301,8 @@ I915_DECL_PW_DOMAINS(xelpd_pwdoms_pw_2,
> >   */
> >
> >  I915_DECL_PW_DOMAINS(xelpd_pwdoms_dc_off,
> > -	XELPD_PW_2_POWER_DOMAINS,
> > +	XELPD_PW_C_POWER_DOMAINS,
> > +	XELPD_PW_D_POWER_DOMAINS,
> >  	POWER_DOMAIN_PORT_DSI,
> >  	POWER_DOMAIN_AUDIO_MMIO,
> >  	POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_A,
> > @@ -1310,14 +1311,38 @@
> I915_DECL_PW_DOMAINS(xelpd_pwdoms_dc_off,
> >  	POWER_DOMAIN_DC_OFF,
> >  	POWER_DOMAIN_INIT);
> >
> > -static const struct i915_power_well_desc xelpd_power_wells_main[] = {
> > +static const struct i915_power_well_desc xelpd_power_wells_dcoff[] = {
> 
> Nit: Here and in the xehpd defintion, s/dcoff/dc_off/ to match other platforms.
> 
> >  	{
> >  		.instances = &I915_PW_INSTANCES(
> >  			I915_PW("DC_off", &xelpd_pwdoms_dc_off,
> >  				.id = SKL_DISP_DC_OFF),
> >  		),
> >  		.ops = &gen9_dc_off_power_well_ops,
> > -	}, {
> > +	}
> > +};
> > +
> > +I915_DECL_PW_DOMAINS(xehpd_pwdoms_dc_off,
> > +	XELPD_PW_2_POWER_DOMAINS,
> > +	POWER_DOMAIN_PORT_DSI,
> > +	POWER_DOMAIN_AUDIO_MMIO,
> > +	POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_A,
> > +	POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_B,
> > +	POWER_DOMAIN_MODESET,
> > +	POWER_DOMAIN_DC_OFF,
> > +	POWER_DOMAIN_INIT);
> > +
> > +static const struct i915_power_well_desc xehpd_power_wells_dcoff[] = {
> > +	{
> > +		.instances = &I915_PW_INSTANCES(
> > +			I915_PW("DC_off", &xehpd_pwdoms_dc_off,
> > +				.id = SKL_DISP_DC_OFF),
> > +		),
> > +		.ops = &gen9_dc_off_power_well_ops,
> > +	}
> > +};
> 
> Could you move the xehpd definitions to precede xehpd_power_wells[]?
> 
> Patches 1, 2 look ok to me:
> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
Thank you for the R-b merged Patches 1, 2

- Radhakrishna(RK) Sripada
> 
> > +
> > +static const struct i915_power_well_desc xelpd_power_wells_main[] = {
> > +	{
> >  		.instances = &I915_PW_INSTANCES(
> >  			I915_PW("PW_2", &xelpd_pwdoms_pw_2,
> >  				.hsw.idx = ICL_PW_CTL_IDX_PW_2,
> > @@ -1400,6 +1425,14 @@ static const struct i915_power_well_desc
> xelpd_power_wells_main[] = {
> >  static const struct i915_power_well_desc_list xelpd_power_wells[] = {
> >  	I915_PW_DESCRIPTORS(i9xx_power_wells_always_on),
> >  	I915_PW_DESCRIPTORS(icl_power_wells_pw_1),
> > +	I915_PW_DESCRIPTORS(xelpd_power_wells_dcoff),
> > +	I915_PW_DESCRIPTORS(xelpd_power_wells_main),
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct i915_power_well_desc_list xehpd_power_wells[] = {
> > +	I915_PW_DESCRIPTORS(i9xx_power_wells_always_on),
> > +	I915_PW_DESCRIPTORS(icl_power_wells_pw_1),
> > +	I915_PW_DESCRIPTORS(xehpd_power_wells_dcoff),
> >  	I915_PW_DESCRIPTORS(xelpd_power_wells_main),
> >  };
> >
> > @@ -1624,6 +1657,8 @@ int intel_display_power_map_init(struct
> i915_power_domains *power_domains)
> >
> >  	if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 14)
> >  		return set_power_wells(power_domains, xelpdp_power_wells);
> > +	else if (IS_DG2(i915))
> > +		return set_power_wells(power_domains, xehpd_power_wells);
> >  	else if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 13)
> >  		return set_power_wells(power_domains, xelpd_power_wells);
> >  	else if (IS_DG1(i915))
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list