[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/dsi: Always use unconditional msleep() for the panel_on_delay

[Hans de Goede]

Hi,

On 4/22/23 22:33, Patchwork wrote:
> *Patch Details*
> *Series:*	drm/i915/dsi: Always use unconditional msleep() for the panel_on_delay
> *URL:*	https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/116858/ <https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/116858/>
> *State:*	failure
> *Details:*	https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_116858v1/index.html <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_116858v1/index.html>
> 
> 
>   CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_13043_full -> Patchwork_116858v1_full
> 
> 
>     Summary
> 
> *FAILURE*
> 
> Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_116858v1_full absolutely need to be
> verified manually.
> 
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in Patchwork_116858v1_full, please notify your bug team to allow them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> 
> 
>     Participating hosts (7 -> 7)
> 
> No changes in participating hosts
> 
> 
>     Possible new issues
> 
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_116858v1_full:
> 
> 
>       IGT changes
> 
> 
>         Possible regressions
> 
>   * igt at gem_ppgtt@blt-vs-render-ctx0:
>       o shard-snb: PASS <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13043/shard-snb6/igt@gem_ppgtt@blt-vs-render-ctx0.html> -> FAIL <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_116858v1/shard-snb1/igt@gem_ppgtt@blt-vs-render-ctx0.html>

The only touched file is not used on snb, so this is a false positive.

Regards,

Hans