[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] i915/pmu: Add support for total context runtime for GuC back-end

Dixit, Ashutosh ashutosh.dixit at intel.com
Thu Apr 27 00:51:24 UTC 2023


On Wed, 26 Apr 2023 17:11:27 -0700, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
>

Hi Umesh,

> On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 10:41:41AM -0700, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
> > On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 17:14:32 -0700, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
> >
> >> GPU accumulates the context runtime in a 32 bit counter - CTX_TIMESTAMP
> >> in the context image. This value is saved/restored on context switches.
> >> KMD accumulates these values into a 64 bit counter taking care of any
> >> overflows as needed. This count provides the basis for client specific
> >> busyness in the fdinfo interface.
> >>
> >> KMD accumulation happens just before the context is unpinned and when
> >> context switches out. This works for execlist back-end since execlist
> >> scheduling has visibility into context switches. With GuC mode, KMD does
> >> not have visibility into context switches and this counter is
> >> accumulated only when context is unpinned. Context is unpinned once the
> >> context scheduling is successfully disabled. Disabling context
> >> scheduling is an asynchronous operation.
> >
> > This means guc_context_unpin() is called asynchronously, correct? From
> > guc_context_sched_disable()?
>
> correct
> >
> >> Also if a context is servicing frequent requests, scheduling may never be
> >> disabled on it.
> >>
> >> For GuC mode, since updates to the context runtime may be delayed, add
> >> hooks to update the context runtime in a worker thread as well as when
> >> a user queries for it.
> >>
> >> Limitation:
> >> - If a context is never switched out or runs for a long period of time,
> >>   the runtime value of CTX_TIMESTAMP may never be updated, so the
> >>   counter value may be unreliable. This patch does not support such
> >>   cases. Such support must be available from the GuC FW and it is WIP.
> >>
> >> This patch is an extract from previous work authored by John/Umesh here -
> >> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/496441/?series=105085&rev=4
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa at intel.com>
> >> Co-developed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison at Intel.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison at Intel.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c       | 12 +++++--
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h       |  2 +-
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h |  5 +++
> >>  .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++
> >>  4 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c
> >> index 2aa63ec521b8..e01f222e9e42 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c
> >> @@ -578,16 +578,24 @@ void intel_context_bind_parent_child(struct intel_context *parent,
> >>	child->parallel.parent = parent;
> >>  }
> >>
> >> -u64 intel_context_get_total_runtime_ns(const struct intel_context *ce)
> >> +u64 intel_context_get_total_runtime_ns(struct intel_context *ce)
> >>  {
> >>	u64 total, active;
> >>
> >> +	if (ce->ops->update_stats)
> >> +		ce->ops->update_stats(ce);
> >> +
> >>	total = ce->stats.runtime.total;
> >>	if (ce->ops->flags & COPS_RUNTIME_CYCLES)
> >>		total *= ce->engine->gt->clock_period_ns;
> >>
> >>	active = READ_ONCE(ce->stats.active);
> >> -	if (active)
> >> +	/*
> >> +	 * When COPS_RUNTIME_ACTIVE_TOTAL is set for ce->cops, the backend
> >> +	 * already provides the total active time of the context,
> >
> > Where is this done in the GuC case? I looked but couldn't find it (at least
> > in this version of the patch, it is there in the old version).
>
> In this case, the backend is not providing the total active time, I guess I
> should drop this logic provided ce->stats.active is 0 for GuC mode.

Yes, I think best to skip the active part in this patch since this is a
temporary/inaccurate solution.

>
> >
> >> +	 * so skip this calculation when this flag is set.
> >> +	 */
> >> +	if (active && !(ce->ops->flags & COPS_RUNTIME_ACTIVE_TOTAL))
> >>		active = intel_context_clock() - active;
> >>
> >>	return total + active;
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h
> >> index 0a8d553da3f4..720809523e2d 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h
> >> @@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ intel_context_clear_nopreempt(struct intel_context *ce)
> >>	clear_bit(CONTEXT_NOPREEMPT, &ce->flags);
> >>  }
> >>
> >> -u64 intel_context_get_total_runtime_ns(const struct intel_context *ce);
> >> +u64 intel_context_get_total_runtime_ns(struct intel_context *ce);
> >>  u64 intel_context_get_avg_runtime_ns(struct intel_context *ce);
> >>
> >>  static inline u64 intel_context_clock(void)
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
> >> index e36670f2e626..58b0294d359d 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
> >> @@ -38,6 +38,9 @@ struct intel_context_ops {
> >>  #define COPS_RUNTIME_CYCLES_BIT 1
> >>  #define COPS_RUNTIME_CYCLES BIT(COPS_RUNTIME_CYCLES_BIT)
> >>
> >> +#define COPS_RUNTIME_ACTIVE_TOTAL_BIT 2
> >> +#define COPS_RUNTIME_ACTIVE_TOTAL BIT(COPS_RUNTIME_ACTIVE_TOTAL_BIT)
> >> +
> >>	int (*alloc)(struct intel_context *ce);
> >>
> >>	void (*revoke)(struct intel_context *ce, struct i915_request *rq,
> >> @@ -58,6 +61,8 @@ struct intel_context_ops {
> >>
> >>	void (*sched_disable)(struct intel_context *ce);
> >>
> >> +	void (*update_stats)(struct intel_context *ce);
> >> +
> >>	void (*reset)(struct intel_context *ce);
> >>	void (*destroy)(struct kref *kref);
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> >> index 88e881b100cf..8048a3e97a68 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> >> @@ -1402,13 +1402,25 @@ static void __update_guc_busyness_stats(struct intel_guc *guc)
> >>	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&guc->timestamp.lock, flags);
> >>  }
> >>
> >> +static void guc_context_update_clks(struct intel_context *ce)
> >> +{
> >> +	struct intel_guc *guc = ce_to_guc(ce);
> >> +	unsigned long flags;
> >> +
> >> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&guc->timestamp.lock, flags);
> >> +	lrc_update_runtime(ce);
> >> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&guc->timestamp.lock, flags);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>  static void guc_timestamp_ping(struct work_struct *wrk)
> >>  {
> >>	struct intel_guc *guc = container_of(wrk, typeof(*guc),
> >>					     timestamp.work.work);
> >>	struct intel_uc *uc = container_of(guc, typeof(*uc), guc);
> >>	struct intel_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
> >> +	struct intel_context *ce;
> >>	intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
> >> +	unsigned long index;
> >>	int srcu, ret;
> >>
> >>	/*
> >> @@ -1424,6 +1436,10 @@ static void guc_timestamp_ping(struct work_struct *wrk)
> >>	with_intel_runtime_pm(&gt->i915->runtime_pm, wakeref)
> >>		__update_guc_busyness_stats(guc);
> >
> > How do we know the context images are pinned at this point which is needed
> > for the code below? Where is the pinning happening?
>
> Ah, maybe this should just call - guc_context_update_stats()
> >
> >> +	/* adjust context stats for overflow */
> >> +	xa_for_each(&guc->context_lookup, index, ce)
> >> +		guc_context_update_clks(ce);
> >
> > Here are we saying that we need to do this because the context can get
> > switched out (and context image saved) and back in multiple times without
> > the context getting unpinned? Otherwise guc_context_unpin() would call
> > lrc_update_runtime() and we wouldn't have to do this here.
>
> Mainly for 32 bit overflows. The busyness value obtained from the context
> image is a 32 bit value and could wrap around. If we keep grabbing it
> periodically and accumulate it in the 64 bit value in ce stats, we should
> be good.

But it will not help unless the busyness value in context image is being
updated. Which will only happen if the context switches. So that is why I
was saying this makes sense only if context switches are happening but not
context unpins (which would anyway accumulate the values in
lrc_update_runtime).


>
> >
> >> +
> >>	intel_gt_reset_unlock(gt, srcu);
> >>
> >>	guc_enable_busyness_worker(guc);
> >> @@ -1505,6 +1521,17 @@ void intel_guc_busyness_unpark(struct intel_gt *gt)
> >>	guc_enable_busyness_worker(guc);
> >>  }
> >>
> >> +static void guc_context_update_stats(struct intel_context *ce)
> >> +{
> >> +	if (!intel_context_pin_if_active(ce)) {
> >> +		WRITE_ONCE(ce->stats.active, 0);
> >
> > This is related to the question above about where is ce->stats.active being
> > updated in GuC case. If it is not being updated then we wouldn't have to do
> > this here, we could just initialize it to 0 once or it might already be
> > initialized to 0 (if say ce->stats was kzalloc'd).
>
> Agree, will drop this.
>
> >
> > /> +		return;
> >> +	}
> >> +
> >> +	guc_context_update_clks(ce);
> >> +	intel_context_unpin(ce);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>  static inline bool
> >>  submission_disabled(struct intel_guc *guc)
> >>  {
> >> @@ -2774,6 +2801,7 @@ static void guc_context_unpin(struct intel_context *ce)
> >>  {
> >>	struct intel_guc *guc = ce_to_guc(ce);
> >>
> >> +	lrc_update_runtime(ce);
> >
> > If we call lrc_update_runtime from these 3 code paths (as is done in this
> > patch), we would need to hold guc->timestamp.lock here. Is that happening
> > (I don't see it) or we need to call guc_context_update_clks() here? I am
> > assuming the context image is pinned here so pinning is not an issue.
>
> Maybe will just call guc_context_update_clks() here.

If active is not there, it would be best if we call the same function from
all 3 places (unless the lock is already taken somewhere). Basically
something like:

static void guc_context_update_stats(struct intel_context *ce)
{
	struct intel_guc *guc = ce_to_guc(ce);
	unsigned long flags;

	intel_context_pin(ce);
	spin_lock_irqsave(&guc->timestamp.lock, flags);
	lrc_update_runtime(ce);
	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&guc->timestamp.lock, flags);
	intel_context_unpin(ce);
}

And call this from everywhere.

Thanks.
--
Ashutosh


> >
> >>	unpin_guc_id(guc, ce);
> >>	lrc_unpin(ce);
> >>
> >> @@ -3455,6 +3483,7 @@ static void remove_from_context(struct i915_request *rq)
> >>  }
> >>
> >>  static const struct intel_context_ops guc_context_ops = {
> >> +	.flags = COPS_RUNTIME_CYCLES | COPS_RUNTIME_ACTIVE_TOTAL,
> >>	.alloc = guc_context_alloc,
> >>
> >>	.close = guc_context_close,
> >> @@ -3473,6 +3502,8 @@ static const struct intel_context_ops guc_context_ops = {
> >>
> >>	.sched_disable = guc_context_sched_disable,
> >>
> >> +	.update_stats = guc_context_update_stats,
> >> +
> >>	.reset = lrc_reset,
> >>	.destroy = guc_context_destroy,
> >>
> >> @@ -3728,6 +3759,7 @@ static int guc_virtual_context_alloc(struct intel_context *ce)
> >>  }
> >>
> >>  static const struct intel_context_ops virtual_guc_context_ops = {
> >> +	.flags = COPS_RUNTIME_CYCLES | COPS_RUNTIME_ACTIVE_TOTAL,
> >>	.alloc = guc_virtual_context_alloc,
> >>
> >>	.close = guc_context_close,
> >> @@ -3745,6 +3777,7 @@ static const struct intel_context_ops virtual_guc_context_ops = {
> >>	.exit = guc_virtual_context_exit,
> >>
> >>	.sched_disable = guc_context_sched_disable,
> >> +	.update_stats = guc_context_update_stats,
> >>
> >>	.destroy = guc_context_destroy,
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.36.1


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list