[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Implement fdinfo memory stats printing
Iddamsetty, Aravind
aravind.iddamsetty at intel.com
Thu Aug 3 05:15:38 UTC 2023
On 27-07-2023 15:43, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
>
> Use the newly added drm_print_memory_stats helper to show memory
> utilisation of our objects in drm/driver specific fdinfo output.
>
> To collect the stats we walk the per memory regions object lists
> and accumulate object size into the respective drm_memory_stats
> categories.
>
> Objects with multiple possible placements are reported in multiple
> regions for total and shared sizes, while other categories are
> counted only for the currently active region.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> Cc: Aravind Iddamsetty <aravind.iddamsetty at intel.com>
> Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark at gmail.com>> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drm_client.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 85 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drm_client.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drm_client.c
> index a61356012df8..9e7a6075ee25 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drm_client.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drm_client.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,89 @@ void __i915_drm_client_free(struct kref *kref)
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> +static void
> +obj_meminfo(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> + struct drm_memory_stats stats[INTEL_REGION_UNKNOWN])
> +{
> + struct intel_memory_region *mr;
> + u64 sz = obj->base.size;
> + enum intel_region_id id;
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + /* Attribute size and shared to all possible memory regions. */
> + for (i = 0; i < obj->mm.n_placements; i++) {
> + mr = obj->mm.placements[i];
> + id = mr->id;
> +
> + if (obj->base.handle_count > 1)
> + stats[id].shared += sz;
> + else
> + stats[id].private += sz;
> + }
> +
> + /* Attribute other categories to only the current region. */
> + mr = obj->mm.region;
> + if (mr)
> + id = mr->id;
> + else
> + id = INTEL_REGION_SMEM;
> +
> + if (!obj->mm.n_placements) {
I guess we do not expect to have n_placements set to public objects, is
that right?
Thanks,
Aravind.
> + if (obj->base.handle_count > 1)
> + stats[id].shared += sz;
> + else
> + stats[id].private += sz;
> + }
> +
> + if (i915_gem_object_has_pages(obj)) {
> + stats[id].resident += sz;
> +
> + if (!dma_resv_test_signaled(obj->base.resv,
> + dma_resv_usage_rw(true)))
> + stats[id].active += sz;
> + else if (i915_gem_object_is_shrinkable(obj) &&
> + obj->mm.madv == I915_MADV_DONTNEED)
> + stats[id].purgeable += sz;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void show_meminfo(struct drm_printer *p, struct drm_file *file)
> +{
> + struct drm_memory_stats stats[INTEL_REGION_UNKNOWN] = {};
> + struct drm_i915_file_private *fpriv = file->driver_priv;
> + struct i915_drm_client *client = fpriv->client;
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = fpriv->i915;
> + struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
> + struct intel_memory_region *mr;
> + struct list_head *pos;
> + unsigned int id;
> +
> + /* Public objects. */
> + spin_lock(&file->table_lock);
> + idr_for_each_entry(&file->object_idr, obj, id)
> + obj_meminfo(obj, stats);
> + spin_unlock(&file->table_lock);
> +
> + /* Internal objects. */
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + list_for_each_rcu(pos, &client->objects_list) {
> + obj = i915_gem_object_get_rcu(list_entry(pos, typeof(*obj),
> + client_link));
> + if (!obj)
> + continue;
> + obj_meminfo(obj, stats);
> + i915_gem_object_put(obj);
> + }
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> + for_each_memory_region(mr, i915, id)
> + drm_print_memory_stats(p,
> + &stats[id],
> + DRM_GEM_OBJECT_RESIDENT |
> + DRM_GEM_OBJECT_PURGEABLE,
> + mr->name);
> +}
> +
> static const char * const uabi_class_names[] = {
> [I915_ENGINE_CLASS_RENDER] = "render",
> [I915_ENGINE_CLASS_COPY] = "copy",
> @@ -106,6 +189,8 @@ void i915_drm_client_fdinfo(struct drm_printer *p, struct drm_file *file)
> * ******************************************************************
> */
>
> + show_meminfo(p, file);
> +
> if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) < 8)
> return;
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list