[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Eliminate has_4tile feature flag
Kalvala, Haridhar
haridhar.kalvala at intel.com
Wed Aug 16 16:04:07 UTC 2023
On 8/16/2023 8:48 PM, Matt Roper wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 12:16:25PM +0530, Kalvala, Haridhar wrote:
>> On 8/11/2023 5:16 AM, Matt Roper wrote:
>>> We don't really need a feature flag for has_4tile since there's a
>>> well-defined cutover point (DG2) at which all new platforms started
>>> using Tile4 as their Y-major tiling layout. The GT side of the code
>>> already handles Tile4 vs legacy TileY with checks on the IP version
>>> rather than looking at the feature flag, and we can simplify the display
>>> code similarly (which will also make it more self-contained for re-use
>>> in the Xe driver).
>> Hi Matt,
>>
>> Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Haridhar Kalvala <haridhar.kalvala at intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h | 1 +
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 -
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c | 1 -
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h | 1 -
>>> 4 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h
>>> index 215e682bd8b7..eb630a946343 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h
>>> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ struct drm_printer;
>>> func(overlay_needs_physical); \
>>> func(supports_tv);
>>> +#define HAS_4TILE(i915) (IS_DG2(i915) || DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 14)
>> is this tab space aligned with below lines ?
> Yes, it's aligned with the code below. But if you're just reading the
> diff, the extra column added for the '+' at the beginning of the line
> throws off the spacing.
>
>
> Matt
>
>>> #define HAS_ASYNC_FLIPS(i915) (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 5)
>>> #define HAS_CDCLK_CRAWL(i915) (DISPLAY_INFO(i915)->has_cdclk_crawl)
>>> #define HAS_CDCLK_SQUASH(i915) (DISPLAY_INFO(i915)->has_cdclk_squash)
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>>> index 7a8ce7239bc9..4c6852f0a61c 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>>> @@ -737,7 +737,6 @@ IS_SUBPLATFORM(const struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>>> #define CMDPARSER_USES_GGTT(i915) (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) == 7)
>>> #define HAS_LLC(i915) (INTEL_INFO(i915)->has_llc)
>>> -#define HAS_4TILE(i915) (INTEL_INFO(i915)->has_4tile)
>>> #define HAS_SNOOP(i915) (INTEL_INFO(i915)->has_snoop)
>>> #define HAS_EDRAM(i915) ((i915)->edram_size_mb)
>>> #define HAS_SECURE_BATCHES(i915) (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) < 6)
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
>>> index fcacdc21643c..df7c261410f7 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
>>> @@ -713,7 +713,6 @@ static const struct intel_device_info adl_p_info = {
>>> .has_3d_pipeline = 1, \
>>> .has_64bit_reloc = 1, \
>>> .has_flat_ccs = 1, \
>>> - .has_4tile = 1, \
>>> .has_global_mocs = 1, \
>>> .has_gt_uc = 1, \
>>> .has_llc = 1, \
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
>>> index dbfe6443457b..19d120728ff1 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
>>> @@ -150,7 +150,6 @@ enum intel_ppgtt_type {
>>> func(gpu_reset_clobbers_display); \
>>> func(has_reset_engine); \
>>> func(has_3d_pipeline); \
>>> - func(has_4tile); \
>>> func(has_flat_ccs); \
>>> func(has_global_mocs); \
>>> func(has_gmd_id); \
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Haridhar Kalvala
>>
--
Regards,
Haridhar Kalvala
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list