[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915/display: Dual refresh rate fastset fixes with VRR fastset

Manasi Navare navaremanasi at chromium.org
Wed Aug 16 23:06:55 UTC 2023


Hi Jani,

Thanks for your feedback. Please see my comments below,

On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:02 AM Jani Nikula
<jani.nikula at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 14 Aug 2023, Manasi Navare <navaremanasi at chromium.org> wrote:
> > Dual refresh rate (DRR) fastset seamlessly lets refresh rate
> > throttle without needing a full modeset.
>
> Is this something different from DRRS, or Dynamic Refresh Rate
> Switching?
>
> > However with the recent VRR fastset patches that got merged this
> > logic was broken.
>
> Which commits exactly? "recent patches" is a bit vague.

This essentially was broken because of the commit
"drm/i915/vrr: Allow VRR to be toggled during fastsets" SHA:
1af1d18825d3a5d36b6a3e5049998c3f09321145

This series added the logic of pre computing VRR parameters which
regressed the existing fastset for Dual refresh rate
And this patch has been verified to fix it.

>
> Is there a gitlab issue for this? Is it [1] or is that different?
>
> [1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8851

This gitlab issue mentions the issue with broken fastset on DRR with
VRR fastset.

As a follow up, I have a few questions:

- What will happen if we try to program the VRR min/max/flipline registers
at the same time when we program the VRR En as part of the fastset?
- Is there any HW limitation to do this without a full modeset?

Regards
Manasi

>
> > This is broken because now with VRR fastset
> > VRR parameters are calculated by default at the nominal refresh rate say 120Hz.
> > Now when DRR throttle happens to switch refresh rate to 60Hz, crtc clock
> > changes and this throws a mismatch in VRR parameters and fastset logic
> > for DRR gets thrown off and full modeset is indicated.
> >
> > This patch fixes this by ignoring the pipe mismatch for VRR parameters
> > in the case of DRR and when VRR is not enabled. With this fix, DRR
> > will still throttle seamlessly as long as VRR is not enabled.
> >
> > This will still need a full modeset for both DRR and VRR operating together
> > during the refresh rate throttle and then enabling VRR since now VRR
> > parameters need to be recomputed with new crtc clock and written to HW.
> >
> > This DRR + VRR fastset in conjunction needs more work in the driver and
> > will be fixed in later patches.
>
> I admit I have a hard time wrapping my head around the above explanation
> with the code changes. :/
>
> I'm hoping describing the "what broke" along with a regressing commit
> would help it.
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
> >
> > v3:
> > Compute new VRR params whenever there is fastset and its non DRRS.
> > This will ensure it computes while switching to a fixed RR (Mitul)
> >
> > v2:
> > Check for pipe config mismatch in crtc clock whenever VRR is enabled
> >
> > Cc: Drew Davenport <ddavenport at chromium.org>
> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul at chromium.org>
> > Cc: Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <navaremanasi at chromium.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 14 ++++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > index 763ab569d8f3..2cf3b22adaf7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > @@ -5352,7 +5352,7 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(const struct intel_crtc_state *current_config,
> >       if (IS_G4X(dev_priv) || DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 5)
> >               PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(pipe_bpp);
> >
> > -     if (!fastset || !pipe_config->seamless_m_n) {
> > +     if (!fastset || !pipe_config->seamless_m_n || pipe_config->vrr.enable) {
> >               PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(hw.pipe_mode.crtc_clock);
> >               PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_clock);
> >       }
> > @@ -5387,11 +5387,13 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(const struct intel_crtc_state *current_config,
> >
> >       if (!fastset)
> >               PIPE_CONF_CHECK_BOOL(vrr.enable);
> > -     PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(vrr.vmin);
> > -     PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(vrr.vmax);
> > -     PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(vrr.flipline);
> > -     PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(vrr.pipeline_full);
> > -     PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(vrr.guardband);
> > +     if ((fastset && !pipe_config->seamless_m_n) || pipe_config->vrr.enable) {
> > +             PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(vrr.vmin);
> > +             PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(vrr.vmax);
> > +             PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(vrr.flipline);
> > +             PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(vrr.pipeline_full);
> > +             PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(vrr.guardband);
> > +     }
> >
> >  #undef PIPE_CONF_CHECK_X
> >  #undef PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list