[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 6/9] drm/i915: Eliminate IS_MTL_DISPLAY_STEP
Gustavo Sousa
gustavo.sousa at intel.com
Mon Aug 21 14:28:17 UTC 2023
Quoting Matt Roper (2023-08-14 17:06:39-03:00)
>Stepping-specific display behavior shouldn't be tied to MTL as a
>platform, but rather specifically to the Xe_LPD+ IP. Future non-MTL
>platforms may re-use this IP and will need to follow the exact same
>logic and apply the same workarounds. IS_MTL_DISPLAY_STEP() is dropped
>in favor of a new macro IS_DISPLAY_IP_STEP() that only checks the
>display IP version.
>
>v2:
> - Rename macro to IS_DISPLAY_IP_STEP for consistency with the
> corresponding GT macro and handle steppings the same way.
>v3:
> - Drop the automatic "STEP_" pasting.
>v4:
> - Implement IS_DISPLAY_IP_STEP on top of IS_DISPLAY_IP_RANGE /
> IS_DISPLAY_STEP building blocks and make the parameters from/until
> instead of begin/fixed. (Jani)
> - Fix usage details in comment.
>
>Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
>---
> .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h | 22 +++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pmdemand.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 10 ++++-----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 6 ++---
> 5 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h
>index 215e682bd8b7..7aeff1a5204b 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h
>@@ -71,6 +71,28 @@ struct drm_printer;
> #define OVERLAY_NEEDS_PHYSICAL(i915) (DISPLAY_INFO(i915)->overlay_needs_physical)
> #define SUPPORTS_TV(i915) (DISPLAY_INFO(i915)->supports_tv)
>
>+/* Check that device has a display IP version within the specific range. */
>+#define IS_DISPLAY_IP_RANGE(__i915, from, until) ( \
>+ BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((from) < IP_VER(2, 0)) + \
>+ (DISPLAY_VER_FULL(__i915) >= (from) && \
>+ DISPLAY_VER_FULL(__i915) <= (until)))
>+
>+/*
>+ * Check if a device has a specific IP version as well as a stepping within
>+ * the specified range [begin, fixed). The lower bound is inclusive, the upper
>+ * bound is exclusive (corresponding to the first hardware stepping when the
>+ * workaround is no longer needed). E.g.,
I think comments for patch #4 apply here as well.
With the same suggestions applied here,
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa at intel.com>
>+ *
>+ * IS_DISPLAY_IP_STEP(i915, IP_VER(14, 0), STEP_A0, STEP_B2)
>+ * IS_DISPLAY_IP_STEP(i915, IP_VER(14, 0), STEP_C0, STEP_FOREVER)
>+ *
>+ * "STEP_FOREVER" can be passed as the upper stepping bound for workarounds that
>+ * have no upper bound on steppings of the specified IP version.
>+ */
>+#define IS_DISPLAY_IP_STEP(__i915, ipver, from, until) \
>+ (IS_DISPLAY_IP_RANGE((__i915), (ipver), (ipver)) && \
>+ IS_DISPLAY_STEP((__i915), (from), (until)))
>+
> struct intel_display_runtime_info {
> struct {
> u16 ver;
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
>index 25382022cd27..1c6d467cec26 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
>@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@
> #include "i915_vma.h"
> #include "intel_cdclk.h"
> #include "intel_de.h"
>+#include "intel_display_device.h"
> #include "intel_display_trace.h"
> #include "intel_display_types.h"
> #include "intel_fbc.h"
>@@ -1100,7 +1101,7 @@ static int intel_fbc_check_plane(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>
> /* Wa_14016291713 */
> if ((IS_DISPLAY_VER(i915, 12, 13) ||
>- IS_MTL_DISPLAY_STEP(i915, STEP_A0, STEP_C0)) &&
>+ IS_DISPLAY_IP_STEP(i915, IP_VER(14, 0), STEP_A0, STEP_C0)) &&
> crtc_state->has_psr) {
> plane_state->no_fbc_reason = "PSR1 enabled (Wa_14016291713)";
> return 0;
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pmdemand.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pmdemand.c
>index f7608d363634..744e332fa2af 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pmdemand.c
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pmdemand.c
>@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ int intel_pmdemand_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> &pmdemand_state->base,
> &intel_pmdemand_funcs);
>
>- if (IS_MTL_DISPLAY_STEP(i915, STEP_A0, STEP_C0))
>+ if (IS_DISPLAY_IP_STEP(i915, IP_VER(14, 0), STEP_A0, STEP_C0))
> /* Wa_14016740474 */
> intel_de_rmw(i915, XELPD_CHICKEN_DCPR_3, 0, DMD_RSP_TIMEOUT_DISABLE);
>
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
>index 97d5eef10130..72887c29fb51 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
>@@ -1360,7 +1360,7 @@ static void wm_optimization_wa(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> bool set_wa_bit = false;
>
> /* Wa_14015648006 */
>- if (IS_MTL_DISPLAY_STEP(dev_priv, STEP_A0, STEP_B0) ||
>+ if (IS_DISPLAY_IP_STEP(dev_priv, IP_VER(14, 0), STEP_A0, STEP_B0) ||
> IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 11, 13))
> set_wa_bit |= crtc_state->wm_level_disabled;
>
>@@ -1447,7 +1447,7 @@ static void intel_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> * All supported adlp panels have 1-based X granularity, this may
> * cause issues if non-supported panels are used.
> */
>- if (IS_MTL_DISPLAY_STEP(dev_priv, STEP_A0, STEP_B0))
>+ if (IS_DISPLAY_IP_STEP(dev_priv, IP_VER(14, 0), STEP_A0, STEP_B0))
> intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, MTL_CHICKEN_TRANS(cpu_transcoder), 0,
> ADLP_1_BASED_X_GRANULARITY);
> else if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv))
>@@ -1455,7 +1455,7 @@ static void intel_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> ADLP_1_BASED_X_GRANULARITY);
>
> /* Wa_16012604467:adlp,mtl[a0,b0] */
>- if (IS_MTL_DISPLAY_STEP(dev_priv, STEP_A0, STEP_B0))
>+ if (IS_DISPLAY_IP_STEP(dev_priv, IP_VER(14, 0), STEP_A0, STEP_B0))
> intel_de_rmw(dev_priv,
> MTL_CLKGATE_DIS_TRANS(cpu_transcoder), 0,
> MTL_CLKGATE_DIS_TRANS_DMASC_GATING_DIS);
>@@ -1613,7 +1613,7 @@ static void intel_psr_disable_locked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>
> if (intel_dp->psr.psr2_enabled) {
> /* Wa_16012604467:adlp,mtl[a0,b0] */
>- if (IS_MTL_DISPLAY_STEP(dev_priv, STEP_A0, STEP_B0))
>+ if (IS_DISPLAY_IP_STEP(dev_priv, IP_VER(14, 0), STEP_A0, STEP_B0))
> intel_de_rmw(dev_priv,
> MTL_CLKGATE_DIS_TRANS(cpu_transcoder),
> MTL_CLKGATE_DIS_TRANS_DMASC_GATING_DIS, 0);
>@@ -2087,7 +2087,7 @@ int intel_psr2_sel_fetch_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> goto skip_sel_fetch_set_loop;
>
> /* Wa_14014971492 */
>- if ((IS_MTL_DISPLAY_STEP(dev_priv, STEP_A0, STEP_B0) ||
>+ if ((IS_DISPLAY_IP_STEP(dev_priv, IP_VER(14, 0), STEP_A0, STEP_B0) ||
> IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv) || IS_TIGERLAKE(dev_priv)) &&
> crtc_state->splitter.enable)
> pipe_clip.y1 = 0;
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>index 42a86483c694..b11810308e8a 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>@@ -437,6 +437,8 @@ static inline struct intel_gt *to_gt(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> (MEDIA_VER(i915) >= (from) && MEDIA_VER(i915) <= (until))
>
> #define DISPLAY_VER(i915) (DISPLAY_RUNTIME_INFO(i915)->ip.ver)
>+#define DISPLAY_VER_FULL(i915) IP_VER(DISPLAY_RUNTIME_INFO(i915)->ip.ver, \
>+ DISPLAY_RUNTIME_INFO(i915)->ip.rel)
> #define IS_DISPLAY_VER(i915, from, until) \
> (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= (from) && DISPLAY_VER(i915) <= (until))
>
>@@ -658,10 +660,6 @@ IS_SUBPLATFORM(const struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> #define IS_XEHPSDV_GRAPHICS_STEP(__i915, since, until) \
> (IS_XEHPSDV(__i915) && IS_GRAPHICS_STEP(__i915, since, until))
>
>-#define IS_MTL_DISPLAY_STEP(__i915, since, until) \
>- (IS_METEORLAKE(__i915) && \
>- IS_DISPLAY_STEP(__i915, since, until))
>-
> /*
> * DG2 hardware steppings are a bit unusual. The hardware design was forked to
> * create three variants (G10, G11, and G12) which each have distinct
>--
>2.41.0
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list