[Intel-gfx] [Intel-xe] [PATCH 11/42] drm/xe/lnl: Add IS_LUNARLAKE
Matt Roper
matthew.d.roper at intel.com
Wed Aug 23 17:55:34 UTC 2023
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 10:07:09AM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> From: Balasubramani Vivekanandan <balasubramani.vivekanandan at intel.com>
>
> Add IS_LUNARLAKE in the compat-i915-headers. That macro, to be used by
> the xe driver, checks for the platform, whereas the macro on the i915
> side is always false.
Stepping back, do we really need this macro? Most display code should
be matching on the display IP rather than the platform going forward.
Looking at this series, I only see this used for fake PCH and GMBUS,
both of which I think could probably be checking the display IP rather
than the platform.
Matt
>
> Signed-off-by: Balasubramani Vivekanandan <balasubramani.vivekanandan at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_drv.h | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_drv.h
> index d64d34181790..38b64ff6b9ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_drv.h
> @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ static inline struct drm_i915_private *kdev_to_i915(struct device *kdev)
> #define IS_DG2(dev_priv) IS_PLATFORM(dev_priv, XE_DG2)
> #define IS_PONTEVECCHIO(dev_priv) IS_PLATFORM(dev_priv, XE_PVC)
> #define IS_METEORLAKE(dev_priv) IS_PLATFORM(dev_priv, XE_METEORLAKE)
> +#define IS_LUNARLAKE(dev_priv) IS_PLATFORM(dev_priv, XE_LUNARLAKE)
>
> #define IS_HSW_ULT(dev_priv) (dev_priv && 0)
> #define IS_BDW_ULT(dev_priv) (dev_priv && 0)
> --
> 2.40.1
>
--
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
Linux GPU Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list