[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/12] drm: Reorder drm_sysfs_connector_remove() vs. drm_debugfs_connector_remove()

Ville Syrjala ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Tue Aug 29 11:39:09 UTC 2023


From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>

Use the standard onion peeling approach and call
drm_debugfs_connector_remove() and
drm_sysfs_connector_remove() in the reverse order in
drm_connector_unregister() than what we called their
add counterpartse in drm_connector_register().

The error unwiding in drm_connector_register() is
already doing this the correct way around.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c
index c44d5bcf1284..988996cf6da5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c
@@ -684,8 +684,8 @@ void drm_connector_unregister(struct drm_connector *connector)
 	if (connector->funcs->early_unregister)
 		connector->funcs->early_unregister(connector);
 
-	drm_sysfs_connector_remove(connector);
 	drm_debugfs_connector_remove(connector);
+	drm_sysfs_connector_remove(connector);
 
 	connector->registration_state = DRM_CONNECTOR_UNREGISTERED;
 	mutex_unlock(&connector->mutex);
-- 
2.41.0



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list