[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/12] drm: Reorder drm_sysfs_connector_remove() vs. drm_debugfs_connector_remove()
Ville Syrjala
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Tue Aug 29 11:39:09 UTC 2023
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
Use the standard onion peeling approach and call
drm_debugfs_connector_remove() and
drm_sysfs_connector_remove() in the reverse order in
drm_connector_unregister() than what we called their
add counterpartse in drm_connector_register().
The error unwiding in drm_connector_register() is
already doing this the correct way around.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c
index c44d5bcf1284..988996cf6da5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c
@@ -684,8 +684,8 @@ void drm_connector_unregister(struct drm_connector *connector)
if (connector->funcs->early_unregister)
connector->funcs->early_unregister(connector);
- drm_sysfs_connector_remove(connector);
drm_debugfs_connector_remove(connector);
+ drm_sysfs_connector_remove(connector);
connector->registration_state = DRM_CONNECTOR_UNREGISTERED;
mutex_unlock(&connector->mutex);
--
2.41.0
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list