[PATCH] drm/i915/display: C20 clock state verification

[Imre Deak]

On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 10:00:57AM +0200, Mika Kahola wrote:
> Add clock state verification for C20. Since we
> are usign either A or B contexts, which are
> selected based on clock rate, we first need to
> calculate hw clock and use that clock to select
> which context we are using.

Could the description be clearer that the patch _fixes_ the context
selection? (Also the subject line should always say _what_ the patch
does.)

> 
> Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c | 8 +++++++-
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c
> index 775c1c4a8978..6757e9f941e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c
> @@ -3079,8 +3079,9 @@ static void intel_c20pll_state_verify(const struct intel_crtc_state *state,
>  	const struct intel_c20pll_state *mpll_sw_state = &state->cx0pll_state.c20;
>  	bool use_mplla;
>  	int i;
> +	int hw_clock = intel_c20pll_calc_port_clock(encoder, mpll_hw_state);
>  
> -	use_mplla = intel_c20_use_mplla(mpll_hw_state->clock);
> +	use_mplla = intel_c20_use_mplla(hw_clock);

It's mpll_hw_state->tx[0] C20_PHY_USE_MPLLB which tells the HW which
context to use, so I think it's better to use the same condition here.

>  	if (use_mplla) {
>  		for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mpll_sw_state->mplla); i++) {
>  			I915_STATE_WARN(i915, mpll_hw_state->mplla[i] != mpll_sw_state->mplla[i],
> @@ -3110,6 +3111,11 @@ static void intel_c20pll_state_verify(const struct intel_crtc_state *state,
>  				crtc->base.base.id, crtc->base.name, i,
>  				mpll_sw_state->cmn[i], mpll_hw_state->cmn[i]);
>  	}
> +
> +	I915_STATE_WARN(i915, hw_clock != mpll_sw_state->clock,
> +			"[CRTC:%d:%s] mismatch in C20: Register CLOCK (expected %d, found %d)",
> +			crtc->base.base.id, crtc->base.name,
> +			mpll_sw_state->clock, hw_clock);

I think the intel_crtc_state::port_clock SW/HW state verification is
equivalent to the above, but it's good to verify it here as well. I
would store hw_clock to mpll_hw_state->clock in
intel_c20pll_readout_hw_state() though.

>  }
>  
>  void intel_cx0pll_state_verify(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> -- 
> 2.34.1
>