[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: Keep sagv status updated on icl+
Lisovskiy, Stanislav
stanislav.lisovskiy at intel.com
Wed Feb 1 17:57:37 UTC 2023
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 02:21:26AM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>
> On icl+ SAGV is controlled by masking of the QGV points.
> Reduce the QGV point mask to the same kind of enabled vs.
> disable information that we had on previous platforms.
> Will be useful in answering the question whether SAGV is
> actually enabled or not.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c | 49 +++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> index 1c236f02b380..202321ffbe2a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> @@ -119,6 +119,32 @@ static int adls_pcode_read_psf_gv_point_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static u16 icl_qgv_points_mask(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> +{
> + unsigned int num_psf_gv_points = i915->display.bw.max[0].num_psf_gv_points;
> + unsigned int num_qgv_points = i915->display.bw.max[0].num_qgv_points;
> + u16 qgv_points = 0, psf_points = 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * We can _not_ use the whole ADLS_QGV_PT_MASK here, as PCode rejects
> + * it with failure if we try masking any unadvertised points.
> + * So need to operate only with those returned from PCode.
> + */
> + if (num_qgv_points > 0)
> + qgv_points = GENMASK(num_qgv_points - 1, 0);
> +
> + if (num_psf_gv_points > 0)
> + psf_points = GENMASK(num_psf_gv_points - 1, 0);
> +
> + return ICL_PCODE_REQ_QGV_PT(qgv_points) | ADLS_PCODE_REQ_PSF_PT(psf_points);
> +}
> +
> +static bool is_sagv_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u16 points_mask)
> +{
> + return !is_power_of_2(~points_mask & icl_qgv_points_mask(i915) &
> + ICL_PCODE_REQ_QGV_PT_MASK);
> +}
> +
> int icl_pcode_restrict_qgv_points(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> u32 points_mask)
> {
> @@ -136,6 +162,9 @@ int icl_pcode_restrict_qgv_points(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> return ret;
> }
>
> + dev_priv->display.sagv.status = is_sagv_enabled(dev_priv, points_mask) ?
> + I915_SAGV_ENABLED : I915_SAGV_DISABLED;
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -965,26 +994,6 @@ int intel_bw_calc_min_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static u16 icl_qgv_points_mask(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> -{
> - unsigned int num_psf_gv_points = i915->display.bw.max[0].num_psf_gv_points;
> - unsigned int num_qgv_points = i915->display.bw.max[0].num_qgv_points;
> - u16 qgv_points = 0, psf_points = 0;
> -
> - /*
> - * We can _not_ use the whole ADLS_QGV_PT_MASK here, as PCode rejects
> - * it with failure if we try masking any unadvertised points.
> - * So need to operate only with those returned from PCode.
> - */
> - if (num_qgv_points > 0)
> - qgv_points = GENMASK(num_qgv_points - 1, 0);
> -
> - if (num_psf_gv_points > 0)
> - psf_points = GENMASK(num_psf_gv_points - 1, 0);
> -
> - return ICL_PCODE_REQ_QGV_PT(qgv_points) | ADLS_PCODE_REQ_PSF_PT(psf_points);
> -}
> -
> static int intel_bw_check_data_rate(struct intel_atomic_state *state, bool *changed)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> --
> 2.39.1
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list