[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 11/17] drm/display/dp_mst: Add helpers to query for payload allocation errors
Imre Deak
imre.deak at intel.com
Thu Feb 2 12:35:41 UTC 2023
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 03:15:46PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Hi Imre,
>
> url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Imre-Deak/drm-i915-dp_mst-Add-the-MST-topology-state-for-modesetted-CRTCs/20230131-230853
> base: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-tip drm-tip
> patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230131150548.1614458-12-imre.deak%40intel.com
> patch subject: [PATCH v2 11/17] drm/display/dp_mst: Add helpers to query for payload allocation errors
> config: x86_64-randconfig-m001 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230202/202302021855.yyqIeQ2o-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-8) 11.3.0
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp at intel.com>
> | Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27 at gmail.com>
>
> smatch warnings:
> drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c:3316 drm_dp_add_payload_part1() warn: missing error code 'ret'
>
> vim +/ret +3316 drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
>
> 4d07b0bc403403 drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c Lyude Paul 2022-08-17 3304 int drm_dp_add_payload_part1(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> 4d07b0bc403403 drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c Lyude Paul 2022-08-17 3305 struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *mst_state,
> 4d07b0bc403403 drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c Lyude Paul 2022-08-17 3306 struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *payload)
> ad7f8a1f9ced7f drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c Dave Airlie 2014-06-05 3307 {
> ad7f8a1f9ced7f drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c Dave Airlie 2014-06-05 3308 struct drm_dp_mst_port *port;
> 5c4df7ffba973b drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c Imre Deak 2023-01-31 3309 int ret = 0;
> 706246c761ddd3 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c Lyude Paul 2018-12-13 3310
> 4d07b0bc403403 drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c Lyude Paul 2022-08-17 3311 port = drm_dp_mst_topology_get_port_validated(mgr, payload->port);
> 33f960e23c29d1 drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c Imre Deak 2022-12-14 3312 if (!port) {
> 33f960e23c29d1 drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c Imre Deak 2022-12-14 3313 drm_dbg_kms(mgr->dev,
> 33f960e23c29d1 drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c Imre Deak 2022-12-14 3314 "VCPI %d for port %p not in topology, not creating a payload\n",
> 33f960e23c29d1 drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c Imre Deak 2022-12-14 3315 payload->vcpi, payload->port);
> 5c4df7ffba973b drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c Imre Deak 2023-01-31 @3316 goto alloc_fail;
>
> Hard to tell if this is an error path or a success path.
thanks for the report. The function before the change in this patchset
returned 0 in this case, so I didn't want to change that. Looking at the
callers none of them uses the return value (except for printing an error
message). I think returning an error code in this case as well would be
more consistent, but that change should be a follow-up.
> 33f960e23c29d1 drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c Imre Deak 2022-12-14 3317 }
> cfe9f90358d97a drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c Lyude Paul 2019-01-10 3318
> 4d07b0bc403403 drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c Lyude Paul 2022-08-17 3319 if (mgr->payload_count == 0)
> 4d07b0bc403403 drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c Lyude Paul 2022-08-17 3320 mgr->next_start_slot = mst_state->start_slot;
> 3769e4c0af5b82 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c Wayne Lin 2021-06-16 3321
> 4d07b0bc403403 drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c Lyude Paul 2022-08-17 3322 payload->vc_start_slot = mgr->next_start_slot;
> cfe9f90358d97a drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c Lyude Paul 2019-01-10 3323
> 4d07b0bc403403 drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c Lyude Paul 2022-08-17 3324 ret = drm_dp_create_payload_step1(mgr, payload);
> 4d07b0bc403403 drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c Lyude Paul 2022-08-17 3325 drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port);
> 4d07b0bc403403 drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c Lyude Paul 2022-08-17 3326 if (ret < 0) {
> 4d07b0bc403403 drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c Lyude Paul 2022-08-17 3327 drm_warn(mgr->dev, "Failed to create MST payload for port %p: %d\n",
> 4d07b0bc403403 drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c Lyude Paul 2022-08-17 3328 payload->port, ret);
> 5c4df7ffba973b drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c Imre Deak 2023-01-31 3329 goto alloc_fail;
> ad7f8a1f9ced7f drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c Dave Airlie 2014-06-05 3330 }
> dfda0df3426483 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c Dave Airlie 2014-08-06 3331
> 5c4df7ffba973b drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c Imre Deak 2023-01-31 3332 payload->alloc_failed = false;
> 5c4df7ffba973b drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c Imre Deak 2023-01-31 3333
> 4d07b0bc403403 drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c Lyude Paul 2022-08-17 3334 mgr->payload_count++;
> 4d07b0bc403403 drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c Lyude Paul 2022-08-17 3335 mgr->next_start_slot += payload->time_slots;
> ad7f8a1f9ced7f drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c Dave Airlie 2014-06-05 3336
> 4d07b0bc403403 drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c Lyude Paul 2022-08-17 3337 return 0;
> 5c4df7ffba973b drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c Imre Deak 2023-01-31 3338
> 5c4df7ffba973b drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c Imre Deak 2023-01-31 3339 alloc_fail:
> 5c4df7ffba973b drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c Imre Deak 2023-01-31 3340 payload->vc_start_slot = -1;
> 5c4df7ffba973b drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c Imre Deak 2023-01-31 3341 payload->alloc_failed = true;
> 5c4df7ffba973b drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c Imre Deak 2023-01-31 3342
> 5c4df7ffba973b drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c Imre Deak 2023-01-31 3343 return ret;
> ad7f8a1f9ced7f drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c Dave Airlie 2014-06-05 3344 }
>
> --
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
> https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list