[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 5/7] drm/i915/wm: move watermark sanitization to intel_wm.[ch]
Jani Nikula
jani.nikula at intel.com
Wed Feb 15 14:20:17 UTC 2023
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 01:21:39PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Mon, 13 Feb 2023, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 10:00:00PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> >> Move the generic sanitize_watermarks() to intel_wm.[ch] and rename as
>> >
>> > It's not generic though. Only the ilk_ stuff uses it.
>>
>> Okay, so the caller side requires HAS_GMCH() and the callee side
>> requires .optimize_watermarks != NULL. That indeed leaves us with PCH
>> split platforms before display version 9.
>>
>> However, the implementation of sanitize_watermarks() seems pretty
>> generic, right?
>>
>> I guess the question is, do you suggest moving the whole thing to
>> i9xx_wm.c and specifically not calling it on display 9+, or do you just
>> want the commit message to reflect the above?
>
> What I actually want is to just get rid of it entirely.
> But that would require doing some work on the ilk wm code.
>
> So in the meantime I suppse I'd prefer to hide it away next
> to all the other ilk wm code so that no one gets any more
> confusedby it.
Thanks, new version on the list.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list