[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: Use calculated io and fast wake lines
Lisovskiy, Stanislav
stanislav.lisovskiy at intel.com
Fri Feb 24 09:32:20 UTC 2023
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 10:53:04AM +0200, Jouni Högander wrote:
> Currently we are using hardcoded 7 for io and fast wake lines.
>
> According to Bspec io and fast wake times are both 42us for
> DISPLAY_VER >= 12 and 50us and 32us for older platforms.
>
> Calculate line counts for these and configure them into PSR2_CTL
> accordingly
>
> Use 45 us for the fast wake calculation as 42 seems to be too
> tight based on testing.
>
> Bspec: 49274, 4289
Checked, can't see any obvious flaws or issue, looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy at intel.com>
>
> Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola at intel.com>
> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza at intel.com>
> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/7725
> Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander at intel.com>
> ---
> .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h | 2 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 78 +++++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> index 9ccae7a46020..fc15f4e5d49f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> @@ -1634,6 +1634,8 @@ struct intel_psr {
> bool psr2_sel_fetch_cff_enabled;
> bool req_psr2_sdp_prior_scanline;
> u8 sink_sync_latency;
> + u8 io_wake_lines;
> + u8 fast_wake_lines;
> ktime_t last_entry_attempt;
> ktime_t last_exit;
> bool sink_not_reliable;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> index 2954759e9d12..059e220144ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> @@ -542,6 +542,14 @@ static void hsw_activate_psr2(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> val |= EDP_PSR2_FRAME_BEFORE_SU(max_t(u8, intel_dp->psr.sink_sync_latency + 1, 2));
> val |= intel_psr2_get_tp_time(intel_dp);
>
> + if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12) {
> + if (intel_dp->psr.io_wake_lines < 9 &&
> + intel_dp->psr.fast_wake_lines < 9)
> + val |= TGL_EDP_PSR2_BLOCK_COUNT_NUM_2;
> + else
> + val |= TGL_EDP_PSR2_BLOCK_COUNT_NUM_3;
> + }
> +
> /* Wa_22012278275:adl-p */
> if (IS_ADLP_DISPLAY_STEP(dev_priv, STEP_A0, STEP_E0)) {
> static const u8 map[] = {
> @@ -558,31 +566,21 @@ static void hsw_activate_psr2(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> * Still using the default IO_BUFFER_WAKE and FAST_WAKE, see
> * comments bellow for more information
> */
> - u32 tmp, lines = 7;
> -
> - val |= TGL_EDP_PSR2_BLOCK_COUNT_NUM_2;
> + u32 tmp;
>
> - tmp = map[lines - TGL_EDP_PSR2_IO_BUFFER_WAKE_MIN_LINES];
> + tmp = map[intel_dp->psr.io_wake_lines - TGL_EDP_PSR2_IO_BUFFER_WAKE_MIN_LINES];
> tmp = tmp << TGL_EDP_PSR2_IO_BUFFER_WAKE_SHIFT;
> val |= tmp;
>
> - tmp = map[lines - TGL_EDP_PSR2_FAST_WAKE_MIN_LINES];
> + tmp = map[intel_dp->psr.fast_wake_lines - TGL_EDP_PSR2_FAST_WAKE_MIN_LINES];
> tmp = tmp << TGL_EDP_PSR2_FAST_WAKE_MIN_SHIFT;
> val |= tmp;
> } else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12) {
> - /*
> - * TODO: 7 lines of IO_BUFFER_WAKE and FAST_WAKE are default
> - * values from BSpec. In order to setting an optimal power
> - * consumption, lower than 4k resolution mode needs to decrease
> - * IO_BUFFER_WAKE and FAST_WAKE. And higher than 4K resolution
> - * mode needs to increase IO_BUFFER_WAKE and FAST_WAKE.
> - */
> - val |= TGL_EDP_PSR2_BLOCK_COUNT_NUM_2;
> - val |= TGL_EDP_PSR2_IO_BUFFER_WAKE(7);
> - val |= TGL_EDP_PSR2_FAST_WAKE(7);
> + val |= TGL_EDP_PSR2_IO_BUFFER_WAKE(intel_dp->psr.io_wake_lines);
> + val |= TGL_EDP_PSR2_FAST_WAKE(intel_dp->psr.fast_wake_lines);
> } else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 9) {
> - val |= EDP_PSR2_IO_BUFFER_WAKE(7);
> - val |= EDP_PSR2_FAST_WAKE(7);
> + val |= EDP_PSR2_IO_BUFFER_WAKE(intel_dp->psr.io_wake_lines);
> + val |= EDP_PSR2_FAST_WAKE(intel_dp->psr.fast_wake_lines);
> }
>
> if (intel_dp->psr.req_psr2_sdp_prior_scanline)
> @@ -829,6 +827,46 @@ static bool _compute_psr2_sdp_prior_scanline_indication(struct intel_dp *intel_d
> return true;
> }
>
> +static bool _compute_psr2_wake_times(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> + struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> + int io_wake_lines, io_wake_time, fast_wake_lines, fast_wake_time;
> + u8 max_wake_lines;
> +
> + if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 12) {
> + io_wake_time = 42;
> + /*
> + * According to Bspec it's 42us, but based on testing
> + * it is not enough -> use 45 us.
> + */
> + fast_wake_time = 45;
> + max_wake_lines = 12;
> + } else {
> + io_wake_time = 50;
> + fast_wake_time = 32;
> + max_wake_lines = 8;
> + }
> +
> + io_wake_lines = intel_usecs_to_scanlines(
> + &crtc_state->uapi.adjusted_mode, io_wake_time);
> + fast_wake_lines = intel_usecs_to_scanlines(
> + &crtc_state->uapi.adjusted_mode, fast_wake_time);
> +
> + if (io_wake_lines > max_wake_lines ||
> + fast_wake_lines > max_wake_lines)
> + return false;
> +
> + if (i915->params.psr_safest_params)
> + io_wake_lines = fast_wake_lines = max_wake_lines;
> +
> + /* According to Bspec lower limit should be set as 7 lines. */
> + intel_dp->psr.io_wake_lines = max(io_wake_lines, 7);
> + intel_dp->psr.fast_wake_lines = max(fast_wake_lines, 7);
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> static bool intel_psr2_config_valid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> @@ -923,6 +961,12 @@ static bool intel_psr2_config_valid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> return false;
> }
>
> + if (!_compute_psr2_wake_times(intel_dp, crtc_state)) {
> + drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> + "PSR2 not enabled, Unable to use long enough wake times\n");
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> if (HAS_PSR2_SEL_FETCH(dev_priv)) {
> if (!intel_psr2_sel_fetch_config_valid(intel_dp, crtc_state) &&
> !HAS_PSR_HW_TRACKING(dev_priv)) {
> --
> 2.34.1
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list