[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/shmem-helper: Fix compile error
Andi Shyti
andi.shyti at linux.intel.com
Tue Feb 28 14:24:44 UTC 2023
Hi,
> >> > Commit 67b7836d4458 ("drm/shmem-helper: Switch to reservation
> >> > lock") removes the drm_gem_shmem_get_pages_locked() and
> >> > drm_gem_shmem_put_pages_locked().
> >> >
> >> > But then commit ddddedaa0db9 ("drm/shmem-helper: Fix locking for
> >> > drm_gem_shmem_get_pages_sgt()") reintroduces it.
> >> >
> >> > Somehow these two commits got mixed up and produce the following
> >> > compile error:
> >>
> >> The 67b7836d4458 goes after ddddedaa0db9 in misc-next. It was a bad
> >> merge conflict resolution in drm-tip that was fixed yesterday, there is
> >> no problem in misc-next. Where do you see this error?
> >
> > yes, indeed! I was indeed surprised to see this mismatch.
> >
> > I see it in the Intel's drm-tip branch[*]
>
> To set the record straight, drm-tip isn't Intel's, it's an integration
> branch shared by the drm community.
yes of course... it's a matter of fast writing :)
> Looks like the same bad merge resolution has resurrected itself somehow,
> maybe Thomas'
>
> commit 418ce969b4c8533c7c76cc0b7adeb432ccdc137e
> Author: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de>
> Date: Tue Feb 28 10:03:24 2023 +0100
>
> 2023y-02m-28d-09h-02m-44s UTC: drm-tip rerere cache update
>
> git version 2.39.2
>
> in drm-rerere brought it back.
>
> And the build is indeed currently broken.
>
> Moreover, when the build was fine for a while, apparently the changes in
> shmem broke a bunch of machines in Intel CI. And due to this, we aren't
> getting any CI results for incoming patches right now.
Is there any plans for fixing it?
Andi
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list