[Intel-gfx] [RFC 2/2] drm/i915/display: Add 480 MHz CDCLK steps for RPL-U
Matt Roper
matthew.d.roper at intel.com
Tue Jan 10 01:08:28 UTC 2023
On Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 11:06:43AM +0530, Chaitanya Kumar Borah wrote:
> A new step of 480MHz has been added on SKUs that have a RPL-U
> device id to support 120Hz displays more efficiently. Use a
> new quirk to identify the machine for which this change needs
> to be applied.
>
> BSpec: 55409
>
> Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Kumar Borah <chaitanya.kumar.borah at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> index 0c107a38f9d0..a437ac446871 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> @@ -1329,6 +1329,27 @@ static const struct intel_cdclk_vals adlp_cdclk_table[] = {
> {}
> };
>
> +static const struct intel_cdclk_vals rplu_cdclk_table[] = {
> + { .refclk = 19200, .cdclk = 172800, .divider = 3, .ratio = 27 },
> + { .refclk = 19200, .cdclk = 192000, .divider = 2, .ratio = 20 },
Are we missing an entry for 307.2 MHz here?
> + { .refclk = 19200, .cdclk = 480000, .divider = 2, .ratio = 50 },
> + { .refclk = 19200, .cdclk = 556800, .divider = 2, .ratio = 58 },
> + { .refclk = 19200, .cdclk = 652800, .divider = 2, .ratio = 68 },
> +
> + { .refclk = 24000, .cdclk = 176000, .divider = 3, .ratio = 22 },
> + { .refclk = 24000, .cdclk = 192000, .divider = 2, .ratio = 16 },
And 312 MHz here?
> + { .refclk = 24000, .cdclk = 480000, .divider = 2, .ratio = 40 },
> + { .refclk = 24000, .cdclk = 552000, .divider = 2, .ratio = 46 },
> + { .refclk = 24400, .cdclk = 648000, .divider = 2, .ratio = 54 },
Typo in refclk here? Actually, it looks like we may have the same typo
in the ADL-P table as well.
> +
> + { .refclk = 38400, .cdclk = 179200, .divider = 3, .ratio = 14 },
> + { .refclk = 38400, .cdclk = 192000, .divider = 2, .ratio = 10 },
And missing 307.2 MHz again?
Matt
> + { .refclk = 38400, .cdclk = 480000, .divider = 2, .ratio = 25 },
> + { .refclk = 38400, .cdclk = 556800, .divider = 2, .ratio = 29 },
> + { .refclk = 38400, .cdclk = 652800, .divider = 2, .ratio = 34 },
> + {}
> +};
> +
> static const struct intel_cdclk_vals dg2_cdclk_table[] = {
> { .refclk = 38400, .cdclk = 163200, .divider = 2, .ratio = 34, .waveform = 0x8888 },
> { .refclk = 38400, .cdclk = 204000, .divider = 2, .ratio = 34, .waveform = 0x9248 },
> @@ -3353,6 +3374,8 @@ void intel_init_cdclk_hooks(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> /* Wa_22011320316:adl-p[a0] */
> if (IS_ADLP_DISPLAY_STEP(dev_priv, STEP_A0, STEP_B0))
> dev_priv->display.cdclk.table = adlp_a_step_cdclk_table;
> + else if (IS_ADLP_RPLU(dev_priv))
> + dev_priv->display.cdclk.table = rplu_cdclk_table;
> else
> dev_priv->display.cdclk.table = adlp_cdclk_table;
> } else if (IS_ROCKETLAKE(dev_priv)) {
> --
> 2.25.1
>
--
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
Linux GPU Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list