[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4] vfio: fix potential deadlock on vfio group lock

Alex Williamson alex.williamson at redhat.com
Tue Jan 17 21:22:52 UTC 2023


On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 19:03:51 -0500
Matthew Rosato <mjrosato at linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> Currently it is possible that the final put of a KVM reference comes from
> vfio during its device close operation.  This occurs while the vfio group
> lock is held; however, if the vfio device is still in the kvm device list,
> then the following call chain could result in a deadlock:
> 
> kvm_put_kvm
>  -> kvm_destroy_vm
>   -> kvm_destroy_devices
>    -> kvm_vfio_destroy
>     -> kvm_vfio_file_set_kvm
>      -> vfio_file_set_kvm
>       -> group->group_lock/group_rwsem  
> 
> Avoid this scenario by having vfio core code acquire a KVM reference
> the first time a device is opened and hold that reference until right
> after the group lock is released after the last device is closed.
> 
> Fixes: 421cfe6596f6 ("vfio: remove VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM")
> Reported-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson at redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato at linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> Changes from v3:
> * Can't check for open_count after the group lock has been dropped because
>   it would be possible for the count to change again once the group lock
>   is dropped (Jason)
>   Solve this by stashing a copy of the kvm and put_kvm while the group
>   lock is held, nullifying the device copies of these in device_close()
>   as soon as the open_count reaches 0, and then checking to see if the
>   device->kvm changed before dropping the group lock.  If it changed
>   during close, we can drop the reference using the stashed kvm and put
>   function after dropping the group lock.
> 
> Changes from v2:
> * Re-arrange vfio_kvm_set_kvm_safe error path to still trigger
>   device_open with device->kvm=NULL (Alex)
> * get device->dev_set->lock when checking device->open_count (Alex)
> * but don't hold it over the kvm_put_kvm (Jason)
> * get kvm_put symbol upfront and stash it in device until close (Jason)
> * check CONFIG_HAVE_KVM to avoid build errors on architectures without
>   KVM support
> 
> Changes from v1:
> * Re-write using symbol get logic to get kvm ref during first device
>   open, release the ref during device fd close after group lock is
>   released
> * Drop kvm get/put changes to drivers; now that vfio core holds a
>   kvm ref until sometime after the device_close op is called, it
>   should be fine for drivers to get and put their own references to it.
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/group.c     | 23 +++++++++++++--
>  drivers/vfio/vfio.h      |  9 ++++++
>  drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  include/linux/vfio.h     |  2 +-
>  4 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/group.c b/drivers/vfio/group.c
> index bb24b2f0271e..b396c17d7390 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/group.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/group.c
> @@ -165,9 +165,9 @@ static int vfio_device_group_open(struct vfio_device *device)
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * Here we pass the KVM pointer with the group under the lock.  If the
> -	 * device driver will use it, it must obtain a reference and release it
> -	 * during close_device.
> +	 * Here we pass the KVM pointer with the group under the lock.  A
> +	 * reference will be obtained the first time the device is opened and
> +	 * will be held until the open_count reaches 0.
>  	 */
>  	ret = vfio_device_open(device, device->group->iommufd,
>  			       device->group->kvm);
> @@ -179,9 +179,26 @@ static int vfio_device_group_open(struct vfio_device *device)
>  
>  void vfio_device_group_close(struct vfio_device *device)
>  {
> +	void (*put_kvm)(struct kvm *kvm);
> +	struct kvm *kvm;
> +
>  	mutex_lock(&device->group->group_lock);
> +	kvm = device->kvm;
> +	put_kvm = device->put_kvm;
>  	vfio_device_close(device, device->group->iommufd);
> +	if (kvm == device->kvm)
> +		kvm = NULL;

Hmm, so we're using whether the device->kvm pointer gets cleared in
last_close to detect whether we should put the kvm reference.  That's a
bit obscure.  Our get and put is also asymmetric.

Did we decide that we couldn't do this via a schedule_work() from the
last_close function, ie. implementing our own version of an async put?
It seems like that potentially has a cleaner implementation, symmetric
call points, handling all the storing and clearing of kvm related
pointers within the get/put wrappers, passing only a vfio_device to the
put wrapper, using the "vfio_device_" prefix for both.  Potentially
we'd just want an unconditional flush outside of lock here for
deterministic release.

What's the downside?  Thanks,

Alex

>  	mutex_unlock(&device->group->group_lock);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The last kvm reference will trigger kvm_destroy_vm, which
> can in
> +	 * turn re-enter vfio and attempt to acquire the group lock.
>  Therefore
> +	 * we get a copy of the kvm pointer and the put function
> under the
> +	 * group lock but wait to put that reference until after
> releasing the
> +	 * lock.
> +	 */
> +	if (kvm)
> +		vfio_kvm_put_kvm(put_kvm, kvm);
>  }
>  
>  static struct file *vfio_device_open_file(struct vfio_device *device)
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> index f8219a438bfb..08a5a23d6fef 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> @@ -251,4 +251,13 @@ extern bool vfio_noiommu __read_mostly;
>  enum { vfio_noiommu = false };
>  #endif
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM
> +void vfio_kvm_put_kvm(void (*put)(struct kvm *kvm), struct kvm *kvm);
> +#else
> +static inline void vfio_kvm_put_kvm(void (*put)(struct kvm *kvm),
> +				    struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> index 5177bb061b17..c6bb07af46b8 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,9 @@
>  #include <linux/fs.h>
>  #include <linux/idr.h>
>  #include <linux/iommu.h>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM
> +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> +#endif
>  #include <linux/list.h>
>  #include <linux/miscdevice.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
> @@ -344,6 +347,49 @@ static bool vfio_assert_device_open(struct
> vfio_device *device) return
> !WARN_ON_ONCE(!READ_ONCE(device->open_count)); }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM
> +static bool vfio_kvm_get_kvm_safe(struct vfio_device *device, struct
> kvm *kvm) +{
> +	void (*pfn)(struct kvm *kvm);
> +	bool (*fn)(struct kvm *kvm);
> +	bool ret;
> +
> +	pfn = symbol_get(kvm_put_kvm);
> +	if (WARN_ON(!pfn))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	fn = symbol_get(kvm_get_kvm_safe);
> +	if (WARN_ON(!fn)) {
> +		symbol_put(kvm_put_kvm);
> +		return false;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = fn(kvm);
> +	if (ret)
> +		device->put_kvm = pfn;
> +	else
> +		symbol_put(kvm_put_kvm);
> +
> +	symbol_put(kvm_get_kvm_safe);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +void vfio_kvm_put_kvm(void (*put)(struct kvm *kvm), struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> +	if (WARN_ON(!put))
> +		return;
> +
> +	put(kvm);
> +	symbol_put(kvm_put_kvm);
> +}
> +#else
> +static bool vfio_kvm_get_kvm_safe(struct vfio_device *device, struct
> kvm *kvm) +{
> +	return false;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  static int vfio_device_first_open(struct vfio_device *device,
>  				  struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd,
> struct kvm *kvm) {
> @@ -361,16 +407,22 @@ static int vfio_device_first_open(struct
> vfio_device *device, if (ret)
>  		goto err_module_put;
>  
> -	device->kvm = kvm;
> +	if (kvm && vfio_kvm_get_kvm_safe(device, kvm))
> +		device->kvm = kvm;
> +
>  	if (device->ops->open_device) {
>  		ret = device->ops->open_device(device);
>  		if (ret)
> -			goto err_unuse_iommu;
> +			goto err_put_kvm;
>  	}
>  	return 0;
>  
> -err_unuse_iommu:
> -	device->kvm = NULL;
> +err_put_kvm:
> +	if (device->kvm) {
> +		vfio_kvm_put_kvm(device->put_kvm, device->kvm);
> +		device->put_kvm = NULL;
> +		device->kvm = NULL;
> +	}
>  	if (iommufd)
>  		vfio_iommufd_unbind(device);
>  	else
> @@ -388,6 +440,7 @@ static void vfio_device_last_close(struct
> vfio_device *device, if (device->ops->close_device)
>  		device->ops->close_device(device);
>  	device->kvm = NULL;
> +	device->put_kvm = NULL;
>  	if (iommufd)
>  		vfio_iommufd_unbind(device);
>  	else
> diff --git a/include/linux/vfio.h b/include/linux/vfio.h
> index 35be78e9ae57..87ff862ff555 100644
> --- a/include/linux/vfio.h
> +++ b/include/linux/vfio.h
> @@ -46,7 +46,6 @@ struct vfio_device {
>  	struct vfio_device_set *dev_set;
>  	struct list_head dev_set_list;
>  	unsigned int migration_flags;
> -	/* Driver must reference the kvm during open_device or never
> touch it */ struct kvm *kvm;
>  
>  	/* Members below here are private, not for driver use */
> @@ -58,6 +57,7 @@ struct vfio_device {
>  	struct list_head group_next;
>  	struct list_head iommu_entry;
>  	struct iommufd_access *iommufd_access;
> +	void (*put_kvm)(struct kvm *kvm);
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IOMMUFD)
>  	struct iommufd_device *iommufd_device;
>  	struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd_ictx;



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list