[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/xehpsdv/selftests: Flush all tiles on test exit
Andi Shyti
andi.shyti at linux.intel.com
Tue Jan 24 16:10:22 UTC 2023
Hi Nirmoy,
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 03:22:12PM +0100, Nirmoy Das wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
>
> We want to idle all tiles when exiting selftests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das at intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti at linux.intel.com>
...
> ---
> .../gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_flush_test.c | 28 +++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_flush_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_flush_test.c
> index b484e12df417..29110abb4fe0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_flush_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_flush_test.c
> @@ -14,21 +14,27 @@
>
> int igt_flush_test(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> {
> - struct intel_gt *gt = to_gt(i915);
> - int ret = intel_gt_is_wedged(gt) ? -EIO : 0;
> + struct intel_gt *gt;
> + unsigned int i;
> + int ret = 0;
>
> - cond_resched();
> + for_each_gt(gt, i915, i) {
> + if (intel_gt_is_wedged(gt))
> + ret = -EIO;
I'm just wondering if it makes sense to check if the gt is
wedged.
Andi
> - if (intel_gt_wait_for_idle(gt, HZ * 3) == -ETIME) {
> - pr_err("%pS timed out, cancelling all further testing.\n",
> - __builtin_return_address(0));
> + cond_resched();
>
> - GEM_TRACE("%pS timed out.\n",
> - __builtin_return_address(0));
> - GEM_TRACE_DUMP();
> + if (intel_gt_wait_for_idle(gt, HZ * 3) == -ETIME) {
> + pr_err("%pS timed out, cancelling all further testing.\n",
> + __builtin_return_address(0));
>
> - intel_gt_set_wedged(gt);
> - ret = -EIO;
> + GEM_TRACE("%pS timed out.\n",
> + __builtin_return_address(0));
> + GEM_TRACE_DUMP();
> +
> + intel_gt_set_wedged(gt);
> + ret = -EIO;
> + }
> }
>
> return ret;
> --
> 2.39.0
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list