[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Implement workaround for CDCLK PLL disable/enable

Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Tue Jan 24 19:35:18 UTC 2023


On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 09:42:24AM +0200, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 02:52:37PM -0500, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 03:16:11PM +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> > > It was reported that we might get a hung and loss of register access in
> > > some cases when CDCLK PLL is disabled and then enabled, while squashing
> > > is enabled.
> > > As a workaround it was proposed by HW team that SW should disable squashing
> > > when CDCLK PLL is being reenabled.
> > 
> > What's the WA lineage for this WA?
> 
> Not sure, what you mean but HSD is: 14017300873

For this HSD, the wa lineage one is actually:

Lineage: 15010685871

so you need to add the wa line for reference, something like:

/* wa_15010685871: dg2, mtl */

but looking to the related ones there I don't believe it is
yet confirmed to mtl...
although it looks that there's a possibility of this staying for
display_ver >= 13....

But more than that I'd like to get someone else from display team
to run a deep review on this. Because I see that you are disabling
it after the cdclk is locked up.

> 
> Stan
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy at intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> > >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> > > index 0c107a38f9d0..e338f288c9ac 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> > > @@ -1801,6 +1801,13 @@ static bool cdclk_compute_crawl_and_squash_midpoint(struct drm_i915_private *i91
> > >  	return true;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +static bool pll_enable_wa_needed(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > > +{
> > > +	return ((IS_DG2(dev_priv) || IS_METEORLAKE(dev_priv))
> > > +		&& dev_priv->display.cdclk.hw.vco > 0
> > > +		&& HAS_CDCLK_SQUASH(dev_priv));
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static void _bxt_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > >  			   const struct intel_cdclk_config *cdclk_config,
> > >  			   enum pipe pipe)
> > > @@ -1815,9 +1822,12 @@ static void _bxt_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > >  	    !cdclk_pll_is_unknown(dev_priv->display.cdclk.hw.vco)) {
> > >  		if (dev_priv->display.cdclk.hw.vco != vco)
> > >  			adlp_cdclk_pll_crawl(dev_priv, vco);
> > > -	} else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11)
> > > +	} else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11) {
> > > +		if (pll_enable_wa_needed(dev_priv))
> > > +			dg2_cdclk_squash_program(dev_priv, 0);
> > > +
> > >  		icl_cdclk_pll_update(dev_priv, vco);
> > > -	else
> > > +	} else
> > >  		bxt_cdclk_pll_update(dev_priv, vco);
> > >  
> > >  	waveform = cdclk_squash_waveform(dev_priv, cdclk);
> > > -- 
> > > 2.37.3
> > > 


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list