[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 RESEND] x86/mm: Fix PAT bit missing from page protection modify mask
Janusz Krzysztofik
janusz.krzysztofik at linux.intel.com
Mon Jul 17 09:42:13 UTC 2023
Hi Borislav,
On Monday, 10 July 2023 10:05:19 CEST Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 09:36:14AM +0200, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> > Assume that adding _PAGE_PAT to _PAGE_CHG_MASK doesn't break pte_modify()
> > and its users, and go for it. Also, add _PAGE_PAT_LARGE to
>
> That's my only worry.
Let me remind you that v1 was free of concerns on potential breakage of
pte_modify(). I can update its commit description as Dave requested and
resubmit if you confirm that it will be reconsidered as a potential solution.
Thanks,
Janusz
>
> I'd suggest we queue this but not send it to Linus now. Instead, let it
> cook in linux-next for the whole 6.5 release cycle so that it can get at
> least *some* testing.
>
> Because if we send it now and something else obscure breaks in a weird
> way in his tree, then we'll have to scramble to fix that too and it'll
> be one helluva mess.
>
> Dave?
>
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list