[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/perf: Consider OA buffer boundary when zeroing out reports

[Dixit, Ashutosh]

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 10:34:02 -0700, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
>
> For reports that are not powers of 2, reports at the end of the OA
> buffer may get split across the buffer boundary. When zeroing out such
> reports, take the split into consideration.
>
> v2: Use OA_BUFFER_SIZE (Ashutosh)
>
> Fixes: 09a36015d9a0 ("drm/i915/perf: Clear out entire reports after reading if not power of 2 size")
> Signed-off-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 11 ++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> index b5491a382bfd..66ab6e1d5c7b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> @@ -867,8 +867,17 @@ static int gen8_append_oa_reports(struct i915_perf_stream *stream,
>			oa_report_id_clear(stream, report32);
>			oa_timestamp_clear(stream, report32);
>		} else {
> +			u8 *oa_buf_end = stream->oa_buffer.vaddr +
> +					 OA_BUFFER_SIZE;

Above we already have "u8 *oa_buf_base = stream->oa_buffer.vaddr;" so we
could just use that?

> +			u32 part = oa_buf_end - (u8 *)report32;

We also have "u8 *report".

In any case:

Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit at intel.com>

> +
>			/* Zero out the entire report */
> -			memset(report32, 0, report_size);
> +			if (report_size <= part) {
> +				memset(report32, 0, report_size);
> +			} else {
> +				memset(report32, 0, part);
> +				memset(oa_buf_base, 0, report_size - part);
> +			}
>		}
>	}
>
> --
> 2.36.1
>