[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 1/2] drm/i915: Migrate platform-dependent mock hugepage selftests to live

Matthew Auld matthew.auld at intel.com
Mon Mar 13 17:24:57 UTC 2023


On 13/03/2023 15:57, Cavitt, Jonathan wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Auld, Matthew <matthew.auld at intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2023 2:36 AM
> To: Cavitt, Jonathan <jonathan.cavitt at intel.com>; intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Dutt, Sudeep <sudeep.dutt at intel.com>; thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com; maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com; Vetter, Daniel <daniel.vetter at intel.com>; De Marchi, Lucas <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>; chris.p.wilson at linux.intel.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] drm/i915: Migrate platform-dependent mock hugepage selftests to live
>>
>> On 28/02/2023 14:08, Matthew Auld wrote:
>>> On 27/02/2023 17:19, Jonathan Cavitt wrote:
>>>> Convert the igt_mock_ppgtt_huge_fill and igt_mock_ppgtt_64K mock
>>>> selftests into
>>>> live selftests as their requirements have recently become
>>>> platform-dependent.
>>>> Additionally, apply necessary platform dependency checks to these tests.
>>>>
>>>> v2: Reorder
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt at intel.com>
>>>
>>> r-b still stands for the series. Note that CI is busted atm though, so
>>> we can't merge this yet. Likely need to re-trigger testing for the
>>> series once CI/drm-tip is working again.
>>
>> CI looks to be back. Can you trigger a retest through patchwork, or
>> resend the series?
> 
> The retest was submitted, but the mock hugepages subtest returned with a failure.
> It didn't do so in the first run, nor did it fail in the prior revision (the one with the
> incorrect patch order).  Do you have any guidance for forward progress?

I think there were some more CI issues. But from the logs it looks like 
we just need to fix the arg handling and related bits, AFAICT. Sent a 
version to trybot (only compile tested):

https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/526566/?series=115072&rev=1

> -Jonathan Cavitt
> 
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>    .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/huge_pages.c   | 22 ++++++++++++++-----
>>>>    1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/huge_pages.c
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/huge_pages.c
>>>> index defece0bcb81..375f119ab261 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/huge_pages.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/huge_pages.c
>>>> @@ -710,7 +710,7 @@ static void close_object_list(struct list_head
>>>> *objects,
>>>>        }
>>>>    }
>>>> -static int igt_mock_ppgtt_huge_fill(void *arg)
>>>> +static int igt_ppgtt_huge_fill(void *arg)
>>>>    {
>>>>        struct i915_ppgtt *ppgtt = arg;
>>>>        struct drm_i915_private *i915 = ppgtt->vm.i915;
>>>> @@ -784,7 +784,8 @@ static int igt_mock_ppgtt_huge_fill(void *arg)
>>>>            GEM_BUG_ON(!expected_gtt);
>>>>            GEM_BUG_ON(size);
>>>> -        if (expected_gtt & I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE_4K)
>>>> +        if (expected_gtt & I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE_4K &&
>>>> +            GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(i915) < IP_VER(12, 50))
>>>>                expected_gtt &= ~I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE_64K;
>>>>            i915_vma_unpin(vma);
>>>> @@ -831,7 +832,7 @@ static int igt_mock_ppgtt_huge_fill(void *arg)
>>>>        return err;
>>>>    }
>>>> -static int igt_mock_ppgtt_64K(void *arg)
>>>> +static int igt_ppgtt_64K(void *arg)
>>>>    {
>>>>        struct i915_ppgtt *ppgtt = arg;
>>>>        struct drm_i915_private *i915 = ppgtt->vm.i915;
>>>> @@ -913,6 +914,17 @@ static int igt_mock_ppgtt_64K(void *arg)
>>>>            unsigned int offset = objects[i].offset;
>>>>            unsigned int flags = PIN_USER;
>>>> +        /*
>>>> +         * For modern GTT models, the requirements for marking a
>>>> page-table
>>>> +         * as 64K have been relaxed.  Account for this.
>>>> +         */
>>>> +
>>>> +        if (GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(i915) >= IP_VER(12, 50)) {
>>>> +            expected_gtt = 0;
>>>> +            expected_gtt |= size & (SZ_64K | SZ_2M) ?
>>>> I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE_64K : 0;
>>>> +            expected_gtt |= size & SZ_4K ? I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE_4K : 0;
>>>> +        }
>>>> +
>>>>            for (single = 0; single <= 1; single++) {
>>>>                obj = fake_huge_pages_object(i915, size, !!single);
>>>>                if (IS_ERR(obj))
>>>> @@ -1910,8 +1922,6 @@ int i915_gem_huge_page_mock_selftests(void)
>>>>            SUBTEST(igt_mock_exhaust_device_supported_pages),
>>>>            SUBTEST(igt_mock_memory_region_huge_pages),
>>>>            SUBTEST(igt_mock_ppgtt_misaligned_dma),
>>>> -        SUBTEST(igt_mock_ppgtt_huge_fill),
>>>> -        SUBTEST(igt_mock_ppgtt_64K),
>>>>        };
>>>>        struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv;
>>>>        struct i915_ppgtt *ppgtt;
>>>> @@ -1962,6 +1972,8 @@ int i915_gem_huge_page_live_selftests(struct
>>>> drm_i915_private *i915)
>>>>            SUBTEST(igt_ppgtt_sanity_check),
>>>>            SUBTEST(igt_ppgtt_compact),
>>>>            SUBTEST(igt_ppgtt_mixed),
>>>> +        SUBTEST(igt_ppgtt_huge_fill),
>>>> +        SUBTEST(igt_ppgtt_64K),
>>>>        };
>>>>        if (!HAS_PPGTT(i915)) {
>>


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list