[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 3/4] drm/i915/psr: Check that vblank is long enough for psr2
Hogander, Jouni
jouni.hogander at intel.com
Tue Mar 21 16:14:57 UTC 2023
On Tue, 2023-03-21 at 17:43 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 06:59:44PM +0200, Jouni Högander wrote:
> > Ensure vblank >= psr2 vblank
> > where
> > Psr2 vblank = PSR2_CTL Block Count Number maximum line count.
> >
> > Bspec: 71580, 49274
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander at intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 8 ++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > index 1050d777a108..1b40d9c73c18 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > @@ -958,6 +958,14 @@ static bool intel_psr2_config_valid(struct
> > intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > return false;
> > }
> >
> > + /* Vblank >= PSR2_CTL Block Count Number maximum line count
> > */
> > + if (crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_vblank_end -
> > + crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_vblank_start < 12) {
>
> Why 12? Shouldn't it be based on the wake_lines/BLOCK_COUNT_NUM
> stuff?
I took this directly from Bspec. I think your suggestions make sense. I
will experiment them and come back on this.
>
>
> If so I would suggest we try someting like this:
>
> psr2_block_count_lines()
> {
> return ...wake_lines... ? 12 : 8;
> }
>
> psr2_block_count()
> {
> return psr2_block_count_lines() / 4;
> }
>
> if (vblank_lengh < psr2_block_count_lines())
> fail;
>
> if (psr_block_count() > 2)
> val |= BLOCK_COUNT_NUM_3;
> else
> val |= BLOCK_COUNT_NUM_2;
>
> > + drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> > + "PSR2 not enabled, too short vblank
> > time\n");
> > + return false;
> > + }
> > +
> > if (HAS_PSR2_SEL_FETCH(dev_priv)) {
> > if (!intel_psr2_sel_fetch_config_valid(intel_dp,
> > crtc_state) &&
> > !HAS_PSR_HW_TRACKING(dev_priv)) {
> > --
> > 2.34.1
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list