[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 2/4] drm/i915/psr: Fix Wa_16013835468 and Wa_14015648006
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Tue Mar 21 16:19:55 UTC 2023
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 03:57:11PM +0000, Hogander, Jouni wrote:
> Thank you Ville for checking my patch. Please see my responses below.
>
> On Tue, 2023-03-21 at 17:34 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 06:59:43PM +0200, Jouni Högander wrote:
> > > PSR WM optimization should be disabled based on any wm level being
> > > disabled. Currently it's disabled always when using delayed vblank.
> > > Also same WA should be applied for ICL as well
> > >
> > > Bspec: 71580
> > >
> > > v2:
> > > - set/clear chicken bit in post_plane_update
> > > - apply for ICL as well
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander at intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h | 1 +
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 67 ++++++++++++---
> > > ----
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c | 7 +-
> > > 3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > > index c32bfba06ca1..60504c390408 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > > @@ -1152,6 +1152,7 @@ struct intel_crtc_state {
> > > bool has_psr2;
> > > bool enable_psr2_sel_fetch;
> > > bool req_psr2_sdp_prior_scanline;
> > > + bool wm_level_disabled;
> > > u32 dc3co_exitline;
> > > u16 su_y_granularity;
> > > struct drm_dp_vsc_sdp psr_vsc;
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > > index 8dbf452d63c2..1050d777a108 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > > @@ -1173,18 +1173,6 @@ static void intel_psr_enable_source(struct
> > > intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > > intel_dp->psr.psr2_sel_fetch_enabled ?
> > > IGNORE_PSR2_HW_TRACKING : 0);
> > >
> > > - /*
> > > - * Wa_16013835468
> > > - * Wa_14015648006
> > > - */
> > > - if (IS_MTL_DISPLAY_STEP(dev_priv, STEP_A0, STEP_B0) ||
> > > - IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 12, 13)) {
> > > - if (crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_vblank_start
> > > !=
> > > - crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_vdisplay)
> > > - intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1,
> > > 0,
> > > -
> > > wa_16013835468_bit_get(intel_dp));
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > if (intel_dp->psr.psr2_enabled) {
> > > if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == 9)
> > > intel_de_rmw(dev_priv,
> > > CHICKEN_TRANS(cpu_transcoder), 0,
> > > @@ -1362,7 +1350,7 @@ static void intel_psr_disable_locked(struct
> > > intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > > * Wa_14015648006
> > > */
> > > if (IS_MTL_DISPLAY_STEP(dev_priv, STEP_A0, STEP_B0) ||
> > > - IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 12, 13))
> > > + IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 11, 13))
> > > intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1,
> > > wa_16013835468_bit_get(intel_dp), 0);
> > >
> > > @@ -1941,33 +1929,64 @@ void intel_psr_pre_plane_update(struct
> > > intel_atomic_state *state,
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > +/*
> > > + * Wa_16013835468
> > > + * Wa_14015648006
> > > + */
> > > +static void wa_16013835468(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, bool
> > > wm_level_disabled)
> > > +{
> > > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> > > +
> > > + if (!IS_MTL_DISPLAY_STEP(dev_priv, STEP_A0, STEP_B0) &&
> > > + !IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 11, 13))
> > > + return;
> >
> > This is still confusing the two different workarounds,
> > and actually losing the one about the delayed vblank.
>
> This is only one Wa. There are two lineage numbers describing same
> workaround.
>
> Can you please point me out the delayed vblank wa description? I can't
> find it from Bspec? Original implementation is referring lineages
> 1601383546 and 14015648006. Neither of these are about delayed vblank
> specifically.
I thought I already copy pasted the quote from the spec
in an earlier reply?
1601383546:
"Display underrun when using delayed vblank with PSR2. Workaround: If
using PSR2 on transcoder A with delayed vblank, set bit 0x46430[23]=0x1.
If using PSR2 on transcoder B with delayed vblank, set bit
0x46430[24]=0x1."
>
> >
> > > +
> > > + if (intel_dp->psr.enabled && wm_level_disabled)
> > > + intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1, 0,
> > > + wa_16013835468_bit_get(intel_dp));
> > > + else
> > > + intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1,
> > > + wa_16013835468_bit_get(intel_dp), 0);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static void _intel_psr_post_plane_update(const struct
> > > intel_atomic_state *state,
> > > - const struct
> > > intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> > > + const struct
> > > intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state,
> > > + const struct
> > > intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state)
> >
> > The rename reduces the signal-to-noise ratio near zero.
>
> Can you please elaborate this a bit more? What would you suggest? I
> need to use both, old and new state to detect difference in
> wm_level_disabled. I want to set/clear the chicken bit only when
> necessary.
I would either just always set/clear the chicken bit (dunno if
there's any real point in optimizing it out), or split the rename
to a separate patch.
>
> >
> > > {
> > > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state-
> > > >base.dev);
> > > struct intel_encoder *encoder;
> > >
> > > - if (!crtc_state->has_psr)
> > > + if (!new_crtc_state->has_psr)
> > > return;
> > >
> > > for_each_intel_encoder_mask_with_psr(state->base.dev,
> > > encoder,
> > > - crtc_state-
> > > >uapi.encoder_mask) {
> > > + new_crtc_state-
> > > >uapi.encoder_mask) {
> > > struct intel_dp *intel_dp =
> > > enc_to_intel_dp(encoder);
> > > struct intel_psr *psr = &intel_dp->psr;
> > > bool keep_disabled = false;
> > >
> > > mutex_lock(&psr->lock);
> > >
> > > - drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, psr->enabled &&
> > > !crtc_state->active_planes);
> > > + drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, psr->enabled &&
> > > + !new_crtc_state->active_planes);
> > >
> > > keep_disabled |= psr->sink_not_reliable;
> > > - keep_disabled |= !crtc_state->active_planes;
> > > + keep_disabled |= !new_crtc_state->active_planes;
> > >
> > > if (!psr->enabled && !keep_disabled)
> > > - intel_psr_enable_locked(intel_dp,
> > > crtc_state);
> > > + intel_psr_enable_locked(intel_dp,
> > > new_crtc_state);
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * Wa_16013835468
> > > + * Wa_14015648006
> > > + */
> > > + if (old_crtc_state->wm_level_disabled !=
> > > + new_crtc_state->wm_level_disabled)
> > > + wa_16013835468(intel_dp,
> > > + new_crtc_state-
> > > >wm_level_disabled);
> > >
> > > /* Force a PSR exit when enabling CRC to avoid CRC
> > > timeouts */
> > > - if (crtc_state->crc_enabled && psr->enabled)
> > > + if (new_crtc_state->crc_enabled && psr->enabled)
> > > psr_force_hw_tracking_exit(intel_dp);
> > >
> > > mutex_unlock(&psr->lock);
> > > @@ -1977,15 +1996,17 @@ static void
> > > _intel_psr_post_plane_update(const struct intel_atomic_state
> > > *state,
> > > void intel_psr_post_plane_update(const struct intel_atomic_state
> > > *state)
> > > {
> > > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state-
> > > >base.dev);
> > > - struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state;
> > > + struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state, *old_crtc_state;
> > > struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> > > int i;
> > >
> > > if (!HAS_PSR(dev_priv))
> > > return;
> > >
> > > - for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state,
> > > i)
> > > - _intel_psr_post_plane_update(state, crtc_state);
> > > + for_each_oldnew_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc,
> > > old_crtc_state,
> > > + new_crtc_state, i)
> > > + _intel_psr_post_plane_update(state, old_crtc_state,
> > > + new_crtc_state);
> > > }
> > >
> > > static int _psr2_ready_for_pipe_update_locked(struct intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp)
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> > > index 50a9a6adbe32..afb751c024ba 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> > > @@ -2273,9 +2273,12 @@ static int skl_wm_check_vblank(struct
> > > intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> > > return level;
> > >
> > > /*
> > > - * FIXME PSR needs to toggle
> > > LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED_PIPE_*
> > > + * PSR needs to toggle LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED_PIPE_*
> > > * based on whether we're limited by the vblank duration.
> > > - *
> > > + */
> > > + crtc_state->wm_level_disabled = level < i915-
> > > >display.wm.num_levels - 1;
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > * FIXME also related to skl+ w/a 1136 (also unimplemented
> > > as of
> > > * now) perhaps?
> > > */
> > > --
> > > 2.34.1
> >
>
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list