[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for x86/topology: fix erroneous smp_num_siblings on Intel Hybrid platform

Saarinen, Jani jani.saarinen at intel.com
Tue Mar 28 06:34:52 UTC 2023


Hi. 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhang, Rui <rui.zhang at intel.com>
> Sent: tiistai 28. maaliskuuta 2023 4.57
> To: Deak, Imre <imre.deak at intel.com>
> Cc: Saarinen, Jani <jani.saarinen at intel.com>; intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for x86/topology: fix erroneous smp_num_siblings
> on Intel Hybrid platform
> 
> On Tue, 2023-03-28 at 09:14 +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > Hi, Imre,
> >
> > Thanks for raising this.
> >
> > On Tue, 2023-03-28 at 00:26 +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> > > Hi Rui,
> > >
> > > after applying your
> > > "x86/topology: fix erroneous smp_num_siblings on Intel Hybrid
> > > platform"
> > >
> > > fix on the drm-tip tree (see the patchwork URL below) the CI tests
> > > show some regression on a HSW and a KBL machine (see [2] and [4]
> > > below) in the i915 driver. However I think they can't be related to
> > > your changes, since on these machines all cores will report the same
> > > number of CPU siblings.
> >
> > Right.
> >
> > >  Could you confirm this and that in general the reported siblings
> > > can only vary on platforms with both E and P cores (ADL-P being the
> > > first such platform)?
> >
> > Right.
> >
> > I don't think the patch could bring any change related.
> > It only affects hybrid platforms.
> 
> Is this topology fix patch the only patch applied? or together with some other patches?
This only. 
> 
> I can hardly imagine that the fix patch can trigger such issues, so I suspect they are
> intermittent issues. say is the regression 100% reproducible?
This is not regression. I assume drm-tip misses this patch (as was not part of 6.3rc yet.)

> does the warning/failure ever show without the patch?
Yes, On our local (3) system's seen on all. 
> 
> BTW, I just happened to see this thread
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/DM8PR11MB565580BCF44661B6A392F0CEE08B9@DM8P 
> R11MB5655.namprd11.prod.outlook.com/
> If the problem on hand has been verified to be not related with the topology fix, can
> we update in this thread as well?
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230323015640.27906-1-rui.zhang@intel.com/
> This is another issue that the patch fixes. And it's better to have a Buglink/Tested-by
> tag in the commit.
> 
> thanks,
> rui
> 
> >
> > Thanks,
> > rui
> > > Thanks,
> > > Imre
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 07:02:25PM +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> > > > == Series Details ==
> > > >
> > > > Series: x86/topology: fix erroneous smp_num_siblings on Intel
> > > > Hybrid platform
> > > > URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/115661/
> > > > State : failure
> > > >
> > > > == Summary ==
> > > >
> > > > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_12921 -> Patchwork_115661v1
> > > > ====================================================
> > > >
> > > > Summary
> > > > -------
> > > >
> > > >   **FAILURE**
> > > >
> > > >   Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_115661v1
> > > > absolutely need to be
> > > >   verified manually.
> > > >
> > > >   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the
> > > > changes
> > > >   introduced in Patchwork_115661v1, please notify your bug team to
> > > > allow them
> > > >   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false
> > > > positives in CI.
> > > >
> > > >   External URL:
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_115661v1/index.
> > > > html
> > > >
> > > > Participating hosts (37 -> 37)
> > > > ------------------------------
> > > >
> > > >   No changes in participating hosts
> > > >
> > > > Possible new issues
> > > > -------------------
> > > >
> > > >   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
> > > > Patchwork_115661v1:
> > > >
> > > > ### IGT changes ###
> > > >
> > > > #### Possible regressions ####
> > > >
> > > >   * igt at i915_selftest@live at hangcheck:
> > > >     - fi-hsw-4770:        [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-WARN][2]
> > > >    [1]:
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12921/fi-hsw-
> 4770/igt at i915_selftest@live at hangcheck.html
> > > >    [2]:
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_115661v1/fi-hsw
> > > > -4770/igt at i915_selftest@live at hangcheck.html
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #### Suppressed ####
> > > >
> > > >   The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or
> > > > statuses.
> > > >   They do not affect the overall result.
> > > >
> > > >   * igt at fbdev@info:
> > > >     - {bat-kbl-2}:        [SKIP][3] ([fdo#109271]) -> [ABORT][4]
> > > >    [3]:
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12921/bat-kbl-
> 2/igt at fbdev@info.html
> > > >    [4]:
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_115661v1/bat-kb
> > > > l-2/igt at fbdev@info.html
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Known issues
> > > > ------------
> > > >
> > > >   Here are the changes found in Patchwork_115661v1 that come from
> > > > known issues:
> > > >
> > > > ### IGT changes ###
> > > >
> > > > #### Issues hit ####
> > > >
> > > >   * igt at gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3 at lmem0:
> > > >     - bat-dg2-11:         [PASS][5] -> [INCOMPLETE][6]
> > > > ([i915#6311])
> > > >    [5]:
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12921/bat-dg2-
> 11/igt at gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3 at lmem0.html
> > > >    [6]:
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_115661v1/bat-dg
> > > > 2-11/igt at gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3 at lmem0.html
> > > >
> > > >   * igt at i915_selftest@live at reset:
> > > >     - bat-rpls-1:         [PASS][7] -> [ABORT][8] ([i915#4983])
> > > >    [7]:
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12921/bat-rpls-
> 1/igt at i915_selftest@live at reset.html
> > > >    [8]:
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_115661v1/bat-rp
> > > > ls-1/igt at i915_selftest@live at reset.html
> > > >
> > > >   * igt at i915_selftest@live at slpc:
> > > >     - bat-rpls-2:         NOTRUN -> [DMESG-FAIL][9] ([i915#6367]
> > > > /
> > > > [i915#7913] / [i915#7996])
> > > >    [9]:
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_115661v1/bat-rp
> > > > ls-2/igt at i915_selftest@live at slpc.html
> > > >
> > > >   * igt at i915_suspend@basic-s3-without-i915:
> > > >     - bat-rpls-2:         NOTRUN -> [ABORT][10] ([i915#6687] /
> > > > [i915#7978])
> > > >    [10]:
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_115661v1/bat-rp
> > > > ls-2/igt at i915_suspend@basic-s3-without-i915.html
> > > >
> > > >   * igt at kms_pipe_crc_basic@nonblocking-crc-frame-sequence at pipe-d-
> > > > dp-1:
> > > >     - bat-dg2-8:          [PASS][11] -> [FAIL][12] ([i915#7932])
> > > >    [11]:
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12921/bat-dg2-
> 8/igt at kms_pipe_crc_basic@nonblocking-crc-frame-sequence at pipe-d-dp-1.html
> > > >    [12]:
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_115661v1/bat-dg
> > > > 2-8/igt at kms_pipe_crc_basic@nonblocking-crc-frame-sequence at pipe-d-d
> > > > p-1.html
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #### Possible fixes ####
> > > >
> > > >   * igt at i915_selftest@live at gt_heartbeat:
> > > >     - fi-kbl-soraka:      [DMESG-FAIL][13] ([i915#5334] /
> > > > [i915#7872]) -> [PASS][14]
> > > >    [13]:
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12921/fi-kbl-
> soraka/igt at i915_selftest@live at gt_heartbeat.html
> > > >    [14]:
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_115661v1/fi-kbl
> > > > -soraka/igt at i915_selftest@live at gt_heartbeat.html
> > > >
> > > >   * igt at i915_selftest@live at reset:
> > > >     - bat-rpls-2:         [ABORT][15] ([i915#4983] / [i915#7913])
> > > > -> [PASS][16]
> > > >    [15]:
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12921/bat-rpls-
> 2/igt at i915_selftest@live at reset.html
> > > >    [16]:
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_115661v1/bat-rp
> > > > ls-2/igt at i915_selftest@live at reset.html
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >   {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored
> > > > when computing
> > > >           the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or
> > > > FAILURE).
> > > >
> > > >   [fdo#109271]:
> > > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271
> > > >   [i915#4983]:
> > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4983
> > > >   [i915#5334]:
> > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5334
> > > >   [i915#6311]:
> > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6311
> > > >   [i915#6367]:
> > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6367
> > > >   [i915#6687]:
> > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6687
> > > >   [i915#7872]:
> > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7872
> > > >   [i915#7913]:
> > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7913
> > > >   [i915#7932]:
> > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7932
> > > >   [i915#7978]:
> > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7978
> > > >   [i915#7996]:
> > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7996
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Build changes
> > > > -------------
> > > >
> > > >   * Linux: CI_DRM_12921 -> Patchwork_115661v1
> > > >
> > > >   CI-20190529: 20190529
> > > >   CI_DRM_12921: 3de6040ce9900a94ec626662d5c6a227b37eeb1c @
> > > > git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
> > > >   IGT_7221: 4b77c6d85024d22ca521d510f8eee574128fe04f @
> > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git
> > > >   Patchwork_115661v1: 3de6040ce9900a94ec626662d5c6a227b37eeb1c @
> > > > git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ### Linux commits
> > > >
> > > > 83d9e76610d5 x86/topology: fix erroneous smp_num_siblings on Intel
> > > > Hybrid platform
> > > >
> > > > == Logs ==
> > > >
> > > > For more details see:
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_115661v1/index.
> > > > html


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list