[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for x86/topology: fix erroneous smp_num_siblings on Intel Hybrid platform
Imre Deak
imre.deak at intel.com
Tue Mar 28 07:23:35 UTC 2023
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 04:57:14AM +0300, Zhang, Rui wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-03-28 at 09:14 +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > Hi, Imre,
> >
> > Thanks for raising this.
> >
> > On Tue, 2023-03-28 at 00:26 +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> > > Hi Rui,
> > >
> > > after applying your
> > > "x86/topology: fix erroneous smp_num_siblings on Intel Hybrid platform"
> > >
> > > fix on the drm-tip tree (see the patchwork URL below) the CI tests
> > > show some regression on a HSW and a KBL machine (see [2] and [4]
> > > below) in the i915 driver. However I think they can't be related
> > > to your changes, since on these machines all cores will report the
> > > same number of CPU siblings.
> >
> > Right.
> >
> > > Could you confirm this and that in general the reported siblings
> > > can only vary on platforms with both E and P cores (ADL-P being
> > > the first such platform)?
> >
> > Right.
> >
> > I don't think the patch could bring any change related.
> > It only affects hybrid platforms.
Ok, thanks for confirming.
> Is this topology fix patch the only patch applied?
Yes.
> or together with some other patches?
>
> I can hardly imagine that the fix patch can trigger such issues, so I
> suspect they are intermittent issues. say
> is the regression 100% reproducible?
No, the problems reported by CI here happened already earlier, before
this patch was applied, so they seem to be sporadic. I don't think
either that they are related to the fix; nevertheless wanted to get
the above clarification from you.
> does the warning/failure ever show without the patch?
Yes, they also happened in CI builds before the patch was applied.
> BTW, I just happened to see this thread
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/DM8PR11MB565580BCF44661B6A392F0CEE08B9@DM8PR11MB5655.namprd11.prod.outlook.com/
> If the problem on hand has been verified to be not related with the
> topology fix, can we update in this thread as well?
This email is in the same thread as the above message.
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230323015640.27906-1-rui.zhang@intel.com/
> This is another issue that the patch fixes.
I added the above link to the patch with a References: trailer.
> And it's better to have a Buglink/Tested-by tag in the commit.
The patch has a link to a bug Jani opened, and his Tested-by can
be added while the fix is applied.
Thanks,
Imre
> thanks,
> rui
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > rui
> > > Thanks,
> > > Imre
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 07:02:25PM +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> > > > == Series Details ==
> > > >
> > > > Series: x86/topology: fix erroneous smp_num_siblings on Intel
> > > > Hybrid platform
> > > > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/115661/
> > > > State : failure
> > > >
> > > > == Summary ==
> > > >
> > > > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_12921 -> Patchwork_115661v1
> > > > ====================================================
> > > >
> > > > Summary
> > > > -------
> > > >
> > > > **FAILURE**
> > > >
> > > > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_115661v1
> > > > absolutely
> > > > need to be
> > > > verified manually.
> > > >
> > > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the
> > > > changes
> > > > introduced in Patchwork_115661v1, please notify your bug team
> > > > to
> > > > allow them
> > > > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false
> > > > positives in CI.
> > > >
> > > > External URL:
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_115661v1/index.html
> > > >
> > > > Participating hosts (37 -> 37)
> > > > ------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > No changes in participating hosts
> > > >
> > > > Possible new issues
> > > > -------------------
> > > >
> > > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
> > > > Patchwork_115661v1:
> > > >
> > > > ### IGT changes ###
> > > >
> > > > #### Possible regressions ####
> > > >
> > > > * igt at i915_selftest@live at hangcheck:
> > > > - fi-hsw-4770: [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-WARN][2]
> > > > [1]:
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12921/fi-hsw-4770/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html
> > > > [2]:
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_115661v1/fi-hsw-4770/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #### Suppressed ####
> > > >
> > > > The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or
> > > > statuses.
> > > > They do not affect the overall result.
> > > >
> > > > * igt at fbdev@info:
> > > > - {bat-kbl-2}: [SKIP][3] ([fdo#109271]) -> [ABORT][4]
> > > > [3]:
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12921/bat-kbl-2/igt@fbdev@info.html
> > > > [4]:
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_115661v1/bat-kbl-2/igt@fbdev@info.html
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Known issues
> > > > ------------
> > > >
> > > > Here are the changes found in Patchwork_115661v1 that come from
> > > > known issues:
> > > >
> > > > ### IGT changes ###
> > > >
> > > > #### Issues hit ####
> > > >
> > > > * igt at gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3 at lmem0:
> > > > - bat-dg2-11: [PASS][5] -> [INCOMPLETE][6]
> > > > ([i915#6311])
> > > > [5]:
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12921/bat-dg2-11/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3@lmem0.html
> > > > [6]:
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_115661v1/bat-dg2-11/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3@lmem0.html
> > > >
> > > > * igt at i915_selftest@live at reset:
> > > > - bat-rpls-1: [PASS][7] -> [ABORT][8] ([i915#4983])
> > > > [7]:
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12921/bat-rpls-1/igt@i915_selftest@live@reset.html
> > > > [8]:
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_115661v1/bat-rpls-1/igt@i915_selftest@live@reset.html
> > > >
> > > > * igt at i915_selftest@live at slpc:
> > > > - bat-rpls-2: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-FAIL][9] ([i915#6367]
> > > > /
> > > > [i915#7913] / [i915#7996])
> > > > [9]:
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_115661v1/bat-rpls-2/igt@i915_selftest@live@slpc.html
> > > >
> > > > * igt at i915_suspend@basic-s3-without-i915:
> > > > - bat-rpls-2: NOTRUN -> [ABORT][10] ([i915#6687] /
> > > > [i915#7978])
> > > > [10]:
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_115661v1/bat-rpls-2/igt@i915_suspend@basic-s3-without-i915.html
> > > >
> > > > * igt at kms_pipe_crc_basic@nonblocking-crc-frame-sequence at pipe-d-
> > > > dp-1:
> > > > - bat-dg2-8: [PASS][11] -> [FAIL][12] ([i915#7932])
> > > > [11]:
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12921/bat-dg2-8/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@nonblocking-crc-frame-sequence@pipe-d-dp-1.html
> > > > [12]:
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_115661v1/bat-dg2-8/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@nonblocking-crc-frame-sequence@pipe-d-dp-1.html
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #### Possible fixes ####
> > > >
> > > > * igt at i915_selftest@live at gt_heartbeat:
> > > > - fi-kbl-soraka: [DMESG-FAIL][13] ([i915#5334] /
> > > > [i915#7872]) -> [PASS][14]
> > > > [13]:
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12921/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_heartbeat.html
> > > > [14]:
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_115661v1/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_heartbeat.html
> > > >
> > > > * igt at i915_selftest@live at reset:
> > > > - bat-rpls-2: [ABORT][15] ([i915#4983] / [i915#7913])
> > > > -> [PASS][16]
> > > > [15]:
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12921/bat-rpls-2/igt@i915_selftest@live@reset.html
> > > > [16]:
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_115661v1/bat-rpls-2/igt@i915_selftest@live@reset.html
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored
> > > > when
> > > > computing
> > > > the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or
> > > > FAILURE).
> > > >
> > > > [fdo#109271]:
> > > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271
> > > > [i915#4983]:
> > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4983
> > > > [i915#5334]:
> > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5334
> > > > [i915#6311]:
> > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6311
> > > > [i915#6367]:
> > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6367
> > > > [i915#6687]:
> > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6687
> > > > [i915#7872]:
> > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7872
> > > > [i915#7913]:
> > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7913
> > > > [i915#7932]:
> > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7932
> > > > [i915#7978]:
> > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7978
> > > > [i915#7996]:
> > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7996
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Build changes
> > > > -------------
> > > >
> > > > * Linux: CI_DRM_12921 -> Patchwork_115661v1
> > > >
> > > > CI-20190529: 20190529
> > > > CI_DRM_12921: 3de6040ce9900a94ec626662d5c6a227b37eeb1c @
> > > > git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
> > > > IGT_7221: 4b77c6d85024d22ca521d510f8eee574128fe04f @
> > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git
> > > > Patchwork_115661v1: 3de6040ce9900a94ec626662d5c6a227b37eeb1c @
> > > > git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ### Linux commits
> > > >
> > > > 83d9e76610d5 x86/topology: fix erroneous smp_num_siblings on
> > > > Intel
> > > > Hybrid platform
> > > >
> > > > == Logs ==
> > > >
> > > > For more details see:
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_115661v1/index.html
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list