[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 2/6] drm/i915/psr: Modify/fix Wa_16013835468 and prepare for Wa_14015648006
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Tue Mar 28 11:17:18 UTC 2023
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 12:34:08PM +0200, Jouni Högander wrote:
> Wa_16013835468 is a separate from Wa_14015648006 and needs to be
> applied for TGL onwards. Fix this by removing all the references to
> Wa_14015648006 and apply Wa_16013835468 according to Bspec.
>
> Also move workaround into separate function as a preparation for
> Wa_14015648006 implementation. Apply this workaround in post plane
> hook.
>
> Bspec: 55378
>
> Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> index 8dbf452d63c2..e66677e0554b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> @@ -1173,18 +1173,6 @@ static void intel_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> intel_dp->psr.psr2_sel_fetch_enabled ?
> IGNORE_PSR2_HW_TRACKING : 0);
>
> - /*
> - * Wa_16013835468
> - * Wa_14015648006
> - */
> - if (IS_MTL_DISPLAY_STEP(dev_priv, STEP_A0, STEP_B0) ||
> - IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 12, 13)) {
> - if (crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_vblank_start !=
> - crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_vdisplay)
> - intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1, 0,
> - wa_16013835468_bit_get(intel_dp));
> - }
> -
> if (intel_dp->psr.psr2_enabled) {
> if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == 9)
> intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, CHICKEN_TRANS(cpu_transcoder), 0,
> @@ -1359,10 +1347,8 @@ static void intel_psr_disable_locked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>
> /*
> * Wa_16013835468
> - * Wa_14015648006
> */
> - if (IS_MTL_DISPLAY_STEP(dev_priv, STEP_A0, STEP_B0) ||
> - IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 12, 13))
> + if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12)
> intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1,
> wa_16013835468_bit_get(intel_dp), 0);
>
> @@ -1941,6 +1927,30 @@ void intel_psr_pre_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> }
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Wa_16013835468
> + */
> +static void wm_optimization_wa(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> + const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> + bool set_wa_bit = false;
> +
> + /* Wa_16013835468 */
> + if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12)
> + set_wa_bit |= crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_vblank_start !=
> + crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_vdisplay;
> +
> + set_wa_bit &= intel_dp->psr.enabled;
> +
> + if (set_wa_bit)
> + intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1, 0,
> + wa_16013835468_bit_get(intel_dp));
> + else
> + intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1,
> + wa_16013835468_bit_get(intel_dp), 0);
> +}
> +
> static void _intel_psr_post_plane_update(const struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> @@ -1966,6 +1976,11 @@ static void _intel_psr_post_plane_update(const struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> if (!psr->enabled && !keep_disabled)
> intel_psr_enable_locked(intel_dp, crtc_state);
>
> + /*
> + * Wa_16013835468
> + */
> + wm_optimization_wa(intel_dp, crtc_state);
Hmm. I think the correct thing would probably be to set the
bit in pre_plane_update() and clear it in post_plane_update().
Otherwise we risk running with the bit in the wrong position
for a while.
> +
> /* Force a PSR exit when enabling CRC to avoid CRC timeouts */
> if (crtc_state->crc_enabled && psr->enabled)
> psr_force_hw_tracking_exit(intel_dp);
> --
> 2.34.1
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list