[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/scdc-helper: Pimp SCDC debugs

[Maxime Ripard]

Hi,

On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 08:14:02PM +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_scdc_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_scdc_helper.c
> index c3ad4ab2b456..2b124152384c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_scdc_helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_scdc_helper.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,8 @@
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
>  
>  #include <drm/display/drm_scdc_helper.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_connector.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_device.h>
>  #include <drm/drm_print.h>
>  
>  /**
> @@ -140,6 +142,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_scdc_write);
>  
>  /**
>   * drm_scdc_get_scrambling_status - what is status of scrambling?
> + * @connector: connector
>   * @adapter: I2C adapter for DDC channel
>   *
>   * Reads the scrambler status over SCDC, and checks the
> @@ -148,14 +151,17 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_scdc_write);
>   * Returns:
>   * True if the scrambling is enabled, false otherwise.
>   */
> -bool drm_scdc_get_scrambling_status(struct i2c_adapter *adapter)
> +bool drm_scdc_get_scrambling_status(struct drm_connector *connector,
> +				    struct i2c_adapter *adapter)

Is there any driver where adapter isn't equal to connector->ddc?

If not, there's no reason to pass both

Maxime