[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 6/9] drm/i915: Use kmap_local_page() in gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Fri Mar 31 08:05:24 UTC 2023
On 31/03/2023 04:33, Ira Weiny wrote:
> Zhao Liu wrote:
>> From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu at intel.com>
>>
>> The use of kmap_atomic() is being deprecated in favor of
>> kmap_local_page()[1], and this patch converts the call from
>> kmap_atomic() to kmap_local_page().
>>
>> The main difference between atomic and local mappings is that local
>> mappings doesn't disable page faults or preemption.
>>
>> With kmap_local_page(), we can avoid the often unwanted side effect of
>> unnecessary page faults or preemption disables.
>>
>> In drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c, functions cpu_fill() and
>> cpu_check() mainly uses mapping to flush cache and check/assign the
>> value.
>>
>> There're 2 reasons why cpu_fill() and cpu_check() don't need to disable
>> pagefaults and preemption for mapping:
>>
>> 1. The flush operation is safe. cpu_fill() and cpu_check() call
>> drm_clflush_virt_range() to use CLFLUSHOPT or WBINVD to flush. Since
>> CLFLUSHOPT is global on x86 and WBINVD is called on each cpu in
>> drm_clflush_virt_range(), the flush operation is global.
>>
>> 2. Any context switch caused by preemption or page faults (page fault
>> may cause sleep) doesn't affect the validity of local mapping.
>>
>> Therefore, cpu_fill() and cpu_check() are functions where the use of
>> kmap_local_page() in place of kmap_atomic() is correctly suited.
>>
>> Convert the calls of kmap_atomic() / kunmap_atomic() to
>> kmap_local_page() / kunmap_local().
>>
>> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220813220034.806698-1-ira.weiny@intel.com
>>
>> v2:
>> * Dropped hot plug related description since it has nothing to do with
>> kmap_local_page().
>> * No code change since v1, and added description of the motivation of
>> using kmap_local_page().
>>
>> Suggested-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen at intel.com>
>> Suggested-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny at intel.com>
>
> First off I think this is fine.
>
> But as I looked at this final selftests patch I began to wonder how the
> memory being mapped here and in the previous selftests patches are
> allocated. Does highmem need to be considered at all? Unfortunately, I
> could not determine where the memory in the SG list of this test gem
> object was allocated.
>
> AFAICS cpu_fill() is only called in create_test_object(). Digging into
> huge_gem_object() did not reveal where these pages were allocated from.
>
> I wonder if these kmap_local_page() calls could be removed entirely based
> on knowing that the pages were allocated from low mem? Removing yet
> another user of highmem altogether would be best if possible.
>
> Do you know how these test objects are created? Do the pages come from
> user space somehow?
FWIW
create_test_object
-> huge_gem_object
-> i915_gem_object_init(obj, &huge_ops, &lock_class, 0);
Which is:
static const struct drm_i915_gem_object_ops huge_ops = {
.name = "huge-gem",
.get_pages = huge_get_pages,
.put_pages = huge_put_pages,
};
And:
huge_get_pages()
...
#define GFP (GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL)
...
page = alloc_page(GFP | __GFP_HIGHMEM);
>
> Regardless this is still a step in the right direction so:
>
> Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny at intel.com>
Yeah LGTM.
FYI I am yet to read through the rest of the series, but I don't think
there will be anything problematic and it passed our CI so likely is
good to pull in.
Regards,
Tvrtko
>
>> Suggested-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fmdefrancesco at gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu at intel.com>
>> ---
>> Suggested by credits:
>> Dave: Referred to his explanation about cache flush.
>> Ira: Referred to his task document, review comments and explanation
>> about cache flush.
>> Fabio: Referred to his boiler plate commit message and his description
>> about why kmap_local_page() should be preferred.
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c | 8 ++++----
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c
>> index a81fa6a20f5a..dcbc0b8e3323 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c
>> @@ -481,12 +481,12 @@ static int cpu_fill(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, u32 value)
>> for (n = 0; n < real_page_count(obj); n++) {
>> u32 *map;
>>
>> - map = kmap_atomic(i915_gem_object_get_page(obj, n));
>> + map = kmap_local_page(i915_gem_object_get_page(obj, n));
>> for (m = 0; m < DW_PER_PAGE; m++)
>> map[m] = value;
>> if (!has_llc)
>> drm_clflush_virt_range(map, PAGE_SIZE);
>> - kunmap_atomic(map);
>> + kunmap_local(map);
>> }
>>
>> i915_gem_object_finish_access(obj);
>> @@ -512,7 +512,7 @@ static noinline int cpu_check(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
>> for (n = 0; n < real_page_count(obj); n++) {
>> u32 *map, m;
>>
>> - map = kmap_atomic(i915_gem_object_get_page(obj, n));
>> + map = kmap_local_page(i915_gem_object_get_page(obj, n));
>> if (needs_flush & CLFLUSH_BEFORE)
>> drm_clflush_virt_range(map, PAGE_SIZE);
>>
>> @@ -538,7 +538,7 @@ static noinline int cpu_check(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
>> }
>>
>> out_unmap:
>> - kunmap_atomic(map);
>> + kunmap_local(map);
>> if (err)
>> break;
>> }
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
>
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list