[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/24] drm/i915/gem: fix function pointer member kernel-doc

Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.vivi at kernel.org
Thu May 4 14:55:15 UTC 2023


On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 12:20:41PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 03 May 2023, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 06:37:27PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> You can't document function pointer member as functions.
> >>
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_region.h:25: warning: Incorrect use of kernel-doc format:          * process_obj - Process the current object
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_region.h:35: warning: Function parameter or member 'process_obj' not described in 'i915_gem_apply_to_region_ops'
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_region.h | 4 +---
> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_region.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_region.h
> >> index 2dfcc41c0170..8a7650b27cc2 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_region.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_region.h
> >> @@ -22,9 +22,7 @@ struct i915_gem_apply_to_region;
> >>   */
> >>  struct i915_gem_apply_to_region_ops {
> >>  	/**
> >> -	 * process_obj - Process the current object
> >> -	 * @apply: Embed this for private data.
> >> -	 * @obj: The current object.
> >> +	 * @process_obj: Process the current object
> >
> > hmm...
> > looking to the process_obj itself I wonder if we don't have a better way
> > to document these function pointer arguments that could be acceptable
> > instead of simply removing them.
> 
> The alternative is pretty much to document the parameters in plain text
> or some mild rst formatting that's not specifically kernel-doc parameter
> documentation.

:( something that could be improved in the overall infra since it is a useful
info.

Anyway, let's move with this then:

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>


> 
> BR,
> Jani.
> 
> >
> > +Mauro in case he has some idea.
> >
> > and the declaration for reference:
> >
> >  int (*process_obj)(struct i915_gem_apply_to_region *apply,
> >                            struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj);
> >
> >>  	 *
> >>  	 * Note that if this function is part of a ww transaction, and
> >>  	 * if returns -EDEADLK for one of the objects, it may be
> >> --
> >> 2.39.2
> >>
> 
> -- 
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list