[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915/hdcp: Fix modeset locking issue in hdcp mst

Nautiyal, Ankit K ankit.k.nautiyal at intel.com
Fri May 12 11:26:15 UTC 2023


On 5/11/2023 3:26 PM, Suraj Kandpal wrote:
> Since topology state is being added to drm_atomic_state now all
> drm_modeset_lock required are being taken from core this raises
> an issue when we try to loop over connector and assign vcpi id to
> our streams as we did not have atomic state to derive acquire_ctx
> from hence we fill in stream info if dpmst encoder is found before
> enabling hdcp.
>
> --v2
> -move prepare streams to beginning of intel_hdcp_enable to avoid
> checking of mst encoder twice [Ankit]
>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal at intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c | 39 ++++++++++-------------
>   1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> index e2c5781ad0ab..bf40d1c7aaa1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> @@ -30,7 +30,8 @@
>   #define KEY_LOAD_TRIES	5
>   #define HDCP2_LC_RETRY_CNT			3
>   
> -static int intel_conn_to_vcpi(struct intel_connector *connector)
> +static int intel_conn_to_vcpi(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
> +			      struct intel_connector *connector)
>   {
>   	struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr;
>   	struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *payload;
> @@ -42,10 +43,10 @@ static int intel_conn_to_vcpi(struct intel_connector *connector)
>   		return 0;
>   	mgr = connector->port->mgr;
>   
> -	drm_modeset_lock(&mgr->base.lock, NULL);
> +	drm_modeset_lock(&mgr->base.lock, state->acquire_ctx);
>   	mst_state = to_drm_dp_mst_topology_state(mgr->base.state);
>   	payload = drm_atomic_get_mst_payload_state(mst_state, connector->port);
> -	if (drm_WARN_ON(mgr->dev, !payload))
> +	if (!payload)
>   		goto out;
>   
>   	vcpi = payload->vcpi;
> @@ -54,7 +55,6 @@ static int intel_conn_to_vcpi(struct intel_connector *connector)
>   		goto out;
>   	}
>   out:
> -	drm_modeset_unlock(&mgr->base.lock);
>   	return vcpi;
>   }
>   
> @@ -69,7 +69,8 @@ static int intel_conn_to_vcpi(struct intel_connector *connector)
>    * policy to mark different content_types for different streams.
>    */
>   static int
> -intel_hdcp_required_content_stream(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
> +intel_hdcp_required_content_stream(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port,
> +				   struct intel_atomic_state *state)
>   {
>   	struct drm_connector_list_iter conn_iter;
>   	struct intel_digital_port *conn_dig_port;
> @@ -81,9 +82,6 @@ intel_hdcp_required_content_stream(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
>   
>   	data->k = 0;
>   
> -	if (dig_port->hdcp_auth_status)
> -		return 0;
> -
>   	drm_connector_list_iter_begin(&i915->drm, &conn_iter);
>   	for_each_intel_connector_iter(connector, &conn_iter) {
>   		if (connector->base.status == connector_status_disconnected)
> @@ -99,7 +97,8 @@ intel_hdcp_required_content_stream(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
>   		if (!enforce_type0 && !dig_port->hdcp_mst_type1_capable)
>   			enforce_type0 = true;

Although not related to this patch, this seems to be off.

This does not seem to belong in loop, as dig_port is passed in the function.

Seems like we are already setting dig_port->hdcp_mst_type1_capable based 
on the topology earlier. (even if any branch/leaf is not hdcp2.2 this is 
set to 0).

So type1 content cannot be shown if dig_port->hdcp_mst_type1_capable is 0.

This would cause an issue with existing patch, as 
dig_port->hdcp_mst_type1_capable is currently set later during 
authentication.

Regards,

Ankit


>   
> -		data->streams[data->k].stream_id = intel_conn_to_vcpi(connector);
> +		data->streams[data->k].stream_id =
> +			intel_conn_to_vcpi(&state->base, connector);
>   		data->k++;
>   
>   		/* if there is only one active stream */
> @@ -122,7 +121,8 @@ intel_hdcp_required_content_stream(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> -static int intel_hdcp_prepare_streams(struct intel_connector *connector)
> +static int intel_hdcp_prepare_streams(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> +				      struct intel_connector *connector)
>   {
>   	struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = intel_attached_dig_port(connector);
>   	struct hdcp_port_data *data = &dig_port->hdcp_port_data;
> @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ static int intel_hdcp_prepare_streams(struct intel_connector *connector)
>   		data->k = 1;
>   		data->streams[0].stream_type = hdcp->content_type;
>   	} else {
> -		ret = intel_hdcp_required_content_stream(dig_port);
> +		ret = intel_hdcp_required_content_stream(dig_port, state);
>   		if (ret)
>   			return ret;
>   	}
> @@ -1917,14 +1917,6 @@ static int hdcp2_authenticate_and_encrypt(struct intel_connector *connector)
>   	for (i = 0; i < tries && !dig_port->hdcp_auth_status; i++) {
>   		ret = hdcp2_authenticate_sink(connector);
>   		if (!ret) {
> -			ret = intel_hdcp_prepare_streams(connector);
> -			if (ret) {
> -				drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
> -					    "Prepare streams failed.(%d)\n",
> -					    ret);
> -				break;
> -			}
> -
>   			ret = hdcp2_propagate_stream_management_info(connector);
>   			if (ret) {
>   				drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
> @@ -2375,9 +2367,12 @@ int intel_hdcp_enable(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>   	 * is capable of HDCP2.2, it is preferred to use HDCP2.2.
>   	 */
>   	if (intel_hdcp2_capable(connector)) {
> -		ret = _intel_hdcp2_enable(connector);
> -		if (!ret)
> -			check_link_interval = DRM_HDCP2_CHECK_PERIOD_MS;
> +		if (!intel_hdcp_prepare_streams(state, connector)) {
> +			ret = _intel_hdcp2_enable(connector);
> +			if (!ret)
> +				check_link_interval =
> +					DRM_HDCP2_CHECK_PERIOD_MS;
> +		}
>   	}
>   
>   	/*


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list