[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v10 00/10] drm/hdcp: Pull HDCP auth/exchange/check into helpers

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On 20/05/2023 00:16, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 07:55:47PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On 19/04/2023 18:43, Mark Yacoub wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> This is v10 of the HDCP patches. The patches are authored by Sean Paul.
>>> I rebased and addressed the review comments in v6-v10.
>>>
>>> Main change in v10 is handling the kernel test bot warnings.
>>>
>>> Patches 1-4 focus on moving the common HDCP helpers to common DRM.
>>> This introduces a slight change in the original intel flow
>>> as it splits the unique driver protocol from the generic implementation.
>>>
>>> Patches 5-7 split the HDCP flow on the i915 driver to make use of the common DRM helpers.
>>>
>>> Patches 8-10 implement HDCP on MSM driver.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -Mark Yacoub
>>>
>>> Sean Paul (10):
>>>     drm/hdcp: Add drm_hdcp_atomic_check()
>>>     drm/hdcp: Avoid changing crtc state in hdcp atomic check
>>>     drm/hdcp: Update property value on content type and user changes
>>>     drm/hdcp: Expand HDCP helper library for enable/disable/check
>>>     drm/i915/hdcp: Consolidate HDCP setup/state cache
>>>     drm/i915/hdcp: Retain hdcp_capable return codes
>>>     drm/i915/hdcp: Use HDCP helpers for i915
>>>     dt-bindings: msm/dp: Add bindings for HDCP registers
>>>     arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add support for HDCP in dp-controller
>>
>> Dear i915 maintainers,
>>
>> I wanted to ping you regarding this patch series. If there are no comments
>> for the series from you side, would it be possible to land Intel-specific
>> and generic patches into drm-intel tree? We will continue working on the msm
>> specific parts and merge them through the msm tree.
> 
> pushed to drm-intel-next.
> 
> should be propagated in a few weeks to drm-next on our next pull request.

Probably there is some kind of confusion here. You've pushed the DSC 
patches, while the response was sent to the HDCP series.

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry