[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/perf: Clear out entire reports after reading if not power of 2 size
Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
umesh.nerlige.ramappa at intel.com
Mon May 22 21:34:18 UTC 2023
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 01:17:49PM -0700, Ashutosh Dixit wrote:
>Clearing out report id and timestamp as means to detect unlanded reports
>only works if report size is power of 2. That is, only when report size is
>a sub-multiple of the OA buffer size can we be certain that reports will
>land at the same place each time in the OA buffer (after rewind). If report
>size is not a power of 2, we need to zero out the entire report to be able
>to detect unlanded reports reliably.
>
>Cc: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa at intel.com>
>Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit at intel.com>
>---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 17 +++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
>index 19d5652300eeb..58284156428dc 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
>@@ -877,12 +877,17 @@ static int gen8_append_oa_reports(struct i915_perf_stream *stream,
> stream->oa_buffer.last_ctx_id = ctx_id;
> }
>
>- /*
>- * Clear out the report id and timestamp as a means to detect unlanded
>- * reports.
>- */
>- oa_report_id_clear(stream, report32);
>- oa_timestamp_clear(stream, report32);
>+ if (is_power_of_2(report_size)) {
>+ /*
>+ * Clear out the report id and timestamp as a means
>+ * to detect unlanded reports.
>+ */
>+ oa_report_id_clear(stream, report32);
>+ oa_timestamp_clear(stream, report32);
>+ } else {
>+ /* Zero out the entire report */
>+ memset(report32, 0, report_size);
Indeed, this was a bug. For a minute, I started wondering if this is the
issue I am running into with the other patch posted for DG2, but then I
see the issue within the first fill of the OA buffer where chunks of the
reports are zeroed out, so this is a new issue.
lgtm,
Reviewed-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa at intel.com>
Thanks,
Umesh
>+ }
> }
>
> if (start_offset != *offset) {
>--
>2.38.0
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list