[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/i915: add a dedicated workqueue inside drm_i915_private
Coelho, Luciano
luciano.coelho at intel.com
Sun May 28 14:58:15 UTC 2023
On Fri, 2023-05-26 at 14:30 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 24 May 2023, Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On 24/05/2023 10:05, Luca Coelho wrote:
> > > In order to avoid flush_scheduled_work() usage, add a dedicated
> > > workqueue in the drm_i915_private structure. In this way, we don't
> > > need to use the system queue anymore.
> > >
> > > This change is mostly mechanical and based on Tetsuo's original
> > > patch[1].
> > >
> > > Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/114608/ [1]
> > > Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel at I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
> > > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> > > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> > > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho at intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 5 ++--
> > > .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c | 2 +-
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c | 2 +-
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 2 +-
> > > .../drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c | 3 ++-
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_drrs.c | 4 +++-
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c | 2 +-
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbdev.c | 3 ++-
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c | 23 +++++++++++--------
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hotplug.c | 18 ++++++++++-----
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_opregion.c | 3 ++-
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c | 4 +++-
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 8 ++++---
> > > .../drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c | 5 ++--
> > > .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_buffer_pool.c | 10 ++++----
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_irq.c | 2 +-
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.c | 10 ++++----
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c | 2 +-
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c | 20 ++++++++--------
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_cs.c | 2 +-
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c | 11 +++++++++
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 9 +++++++-
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 2 +-
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wakeref.c | 2 +-
> > > 24 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
> >
> > I'll take a look at the gt/ parts only since display experts need to
> > okay the point Daniel raise anyway.
>
> There's a bunch of lockdep failures in BAT. Are they possible related to
> switching to unordered wq?
I have not checked those results yet, because I'll send a new version
soon anyway. I tested this before, but with the dedicated wakeref
workqueues, and it all passed cleanly. So it _may_ be related to that
change. I'll check it.
--
Cheers,
Luca.
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list