[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: sync I915_PMU_MAX_GTS to I915_MAX_GT

[Andi Shyti]

Hi Matt,

On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 03:07:22PM -0700, Matt Atwood wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 11:48:33PM +0200, Andi Shyti wrote:
> > Hi Matt,
> > 
> > On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 02:35:47PM -0700, Matt Atwood wrote:
> > > Set I915_PMU_MAX_GTS to value in I915_MAX_GT, theres no reason for these
> > > values to be different.
> > > 
> > > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> > > Cc: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa at intel.com>
> > > Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit at intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood at intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.h | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.h
> > > index 33d80fbaab8b..aa929d8c224a 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.h
> > > @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ enum {
> > >  	__I915_NUM_PMU_SAMPLERS
> > >  };
> > >  
> > > -#define I915_PMU_MAX_GTS 2
> > > +#define I915_PMU_MAX_GTS 4
> > 
> > right! Why not having
> > 
> > 	#define I915_PMU_MAX_GTS	I915_MAX_GT
> > 
> > or... why having I915_PMU_MAX_GTS at all?
> Originally I went the route of s/I915_PMU_MAX_GTS/I915_MAX_GT/g.
> However, this introduces many changes to where you then move
> I915_MAX_GT to and #include blocks in fiels that require these values.
> In the end I decided it was better to keep define and just change the
> value.

OK, makes sense, then how about

 	#define I915_PMU_MAX_GTS	I915_MAX_GT

i915_pmu.h has visibility on I915_MAX_GT.

Andi

> > 
> > Andi
> > 
> > >  /*
> > >   * How many different events we track in the global PMU mask.
> > > -- 
> > > 2.40.0
> MattA