[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/display: Support PSR entry VSC packet to be transmitted one frame earlier
Kahola, Mika
mika.kahola at intel.com
Wed Nov 1 13:33:22 UTC 2023
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2023 11:38 AM
> To: Hogander, Jouni <jouni.hogander at intel.com>
> Cc: Kahola, Mika <mika.kahola at intel.com>; intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915/display: Support PSR entry VSC packet to be transmitted one frame earlier
>
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 09:28:51AM +0000, Hogander, Jouni wrote:
> > On Wed, 2023-11-01 at 10:57 +0200, Mika Kahola wrote:
> > > Display driver shall read DPCD 00071h[3:1] during configuration to
> > > get PSR setup time. This register provides the setup time
> > > requirement on the VSC SDP entry packet. If setup time cannot be met
> > > with the current timings (e.g., PSR setup time + other blanking
> > > requirements > blanking time), driver should enable sending VSC SDP
> > > one frame earlier before sending the capture frame.
> > >
> > > BSpec: 69895 (PSR Entry Setup Frames 17:16)
> > >
> > > v2: Write frames before su entry to correct register (Ville, Jouni)
> > > Move frames before su entry calculation to it's own function
> > > (Ville, Jouni)
> > > Rename PSR Entry Setup Frames register to indicate Lunarlake
> > > specificity (Jouni)
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola at intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h | 1 +
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 77
> > > ++++++++++++++---
> > > --
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr_regs.h | 2 +
> > > 3 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > > index 65ea37fe8cff..a0bcab6f2bec 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > > @@ -1710,6 +1710,7 @@ struct intel_psr {
> > > u32 dc3co_exitline;
> > > u32 dc3co_exit_delay;
> > > struct delayed_work dc3co_work;
> > > + u8 entry_setup_frames;
> > > };
> > >
> > > struct intel_dp {
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > > index ecd24a0b86cb..c9e6651fb3b2 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > > @@ -592,6 +592,9 @@ static void intel_psr_enable_sink(struct
> > > intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp)
> > > if (intel_dp->psr.req_psr2_sdp_prior_scanline)
> > > dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_SU_REGION_SCANLINE_CAPTURE;
> > >
> > > + if (intel_dp->psr.entry_setup_frames > 0)
> > > + dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_FRAME_CAPTURE;
> > > +
> > > drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_EN_CFG, dpcd_val);
> > >
> > > drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_SET_POWER,
> > > DP_SET_POWER_D0); @@ -690,6 +693,9 @@ static void
> > > hsw_activate_psr1(struct intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp)
> > > if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 8)
> > > val |= EDP_PSR_CRC_ENABLE;
> > >
> > > + if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 20)
> > > + val |= LNL_EDP_PSR_ENTRY_SETUP_FRAMES(intel_dp-
> > > >psr.entry_setup_frames);
> > > +
> > > intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, psr_ctl_reg(dev_priv,
> > > cpu_transcoder),
> > > ~EDP_PSR_RESTORE_PSR_ACTIVE_CTX_MASK, val);
> > > }
> > > @@ -727,11 +733,27 @@ static int psr2_block_count(struct intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp)
> > > return psr2_block_count_lines(intel_dp) / 4;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static u8 get_frames_before_su_entry(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) {
> > > + u8 frames_before_su_entry;
> > > +
> > > + frames_before_su_entry = max_t(u8,
> > > + intel_dp-
> > > >psr.sink_sync_latency + 1,
> > > + 2);
> > > +
> > > + /* Entry setup frames must be at least 1 less than frames
> > > before SU entry */
> > > + if (intel_dp->psr.entry_setup_frames >=
> > > frames_before_su_entry)
> > > + frames_before_su_entry += 1;
> >
> > Comment above and the code are not matching. This would match:
> >
> > frames_before_su_entry = intel_dp->psr.entry_setup_frames + 1;
> >
> > > +
> > > + return frames_before_su_entry; }
> > > +
> > > static void hsw_activate_psr2(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > > {
> > > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> > > enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = intel_dp->psr.transcoder;
> > > u32 val = EDP_PSR2_ENABLE;
> > > + u32 psr_val = 0;
> > >
> > > val |=
> > > EDP_PSR2_IDLE_FRAMES(psr_compute_idle_frames(intel_dp));
> > >
> > > @@ -741,7 +763,8 @@ static void hsw_activate_psr2(struct intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp)
> > > if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 10 && DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) <=
> > > 12)
> > > val |= EDP_Y_COORDINATE_ENABLE;
> > >
> > > - val |= EDP_PSR2_FRAME_BEFORE_SU(max_t(u8, intel_dp-
> > > >psr.sink_sync_latency + 1, 2));
> > > + val |=
> > > EDP_PSR2_FRAME_BEFORE_SU(get_frames_before_su_entry(intel_dp));
> > > +
> > > val |= intel_psr2_get_tp_time(intel_dp);
> > >
> > > if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12) { @@ -785,6 +808,9 @@
> > > static void hsw_activate_psr2(struct intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp)
> > > if (intel_dp->psr.req_psr2_sdp_prior_scanline)
> > > val |= EDP_PSR2_SU_SDP_SCANLINE;
> > >
> > > + if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 20)
> > > + psr_val |= LNL_EDP_PSR_ENTRY_SETUP_FRAMES(intel_dp-
> > > >psr.entry_setup_frames);
> > > +
> > > if (intel_dp->psr.psr2_sel_fetch_enabled) {
> > > u32 tmp;
> > >
> > > @@ -798,7 +824,7 @@ static void hsw_activate_psr2(struct intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp)
> > > * PSR2 HW is incorrectly using EDP_PSR_TP1_TP3_SEL and
> > > BSpec is
> > > * recommending keep this bit unset while PSR2 is enabled.
> > > */
> > > - intel_de_write(dev_priv, psr_ctl_reg(dev_priv,
> > > cpu_transcoder), 0);
> > > + intel_de_write(dev_priv, psr_ctl_reg(dev_priv,
> > > cpu_transcoder), psr_val);
> > >
> > > intel_de_write(dev_priv, EDP_PSR2_CTL(cpu_transcoder), val);
> > > }
> > > @@ -1066,6 +1092,36 @@ static bool _compute_psr2_wake_times(struct
> > > intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > > return true;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static void intel_psr_set_entry_setup_frames(struct intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp,
> >
> > You need to convert this into
> >
> > static bool intel_psr_set_entry_setup_frames(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > const struct
> > drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode)
>
> Just make a proper function that returns the number of frames we need.
Yes, there is another issue with this as well as in case of psr_setup_time fails we only return from this function instead of the calling function like it should.
I'll fix this.
Thanks for a review!
-Mika-
>
> >
> > > + const struct
> > > drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode)
> > > +{
> > > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> > > + int psr_setup_time = drm_dp_psr_setup_time(intel_dp-
> > > >psr_dpcd);
> > > +
> > > + intel_dp->psr.entry_setup_frames = 0;
> > > +
> > > + if (psr_setup_time < 0) {
> > > + drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> > > + "PSR condition failed: Invalid PSR setup
> > > time (0x%02x)\n",
> > > + intel_dp->psr_dpcd[1]);
> > > + return;
> >
> > and return false here.
> >
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + if (intel_usecs_to_scanlines(adjusted_mode, psr_setup_time)
> > > +>
> > > + adjusted_mode->crtc_vtotal -
> > > +adjusted_mode->crtc_vdisplay
> > > - 1) {
> > > + if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 20) {
> > > + intel_dp->psr.entry_setup_frames = 1;
> > > + drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> > > + "PSR setup entry frames: %d\n",
> > > + intel_dp-
> > > >psr.entry_setup_frames);
> > > + } else {
> > > + drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> > > + "PSR condition failed: PSR setup
> > > time (%d us) too long\n",
> > > + psr_setup_time);
> > > + }
> >
> > and here as well.
> >
> > > + }
> >
> > and return true here.
> >
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static bool intel_psr2_config_valid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > > struct intel_crtc_state
> > > *crtc_state)
> > > {
> > > @@ -1213,7 +1269,6 @@ void intel_psr_compute_config(struct intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp,
> > > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> > > const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode =
> > > &crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode;
> > > - int psr_setup_time;
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * Current PSR panels don't work reliably with VRR enabled
> > > @@ -1242,21 +1297,7 @@ void intel_psr_compute_config(struct intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp,
> > > return;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - psr_setup_time = drm_dp_psr_setup_time(intel_dp->psr_dpcd);
> > > - if (psr_setup_time < 0) {
> > > - drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> > > - "PSR condition failed: Invalid PSR setup
> > > time (0x%02x)\n",
> > > - intel_dp->psr_dpcd[1]);
> > > - return;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - if (intel_usecs_to_scanlines(adjusted_mode, psr_setup_time)
> > > >
> > > - adjusted_mode->crtc_vtotal -
> > > adjusted_mode->crtc_vdisplay
> > > - 1) {
> > > - drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> > > - "PSR condition failed: PSR setup time
> > > (%d
> > > us) too long\n",
> > > - psr_setup_time);
> > > - return;
> > > - }
> > > + intel_psr_set_entry_setup_frames(intel_dp, adjusted_mode);
> >
> > and have:
> >
> > if (!intel_psr_set_entry_setup_frames(intel_dp, adjusted_mode))
> > return;
> >
> > BR,
> >
> > Jouni Högander
> > >
> > > crtc_state->has_psr = true;
> > > crtc_state->has_psr2 = intel_psr2_config_valid(intel_dp,
> > > crtc_state); diff --git
> > > a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr_regs.h
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr_regs.h
> > > index d39951383c92..efe4306b37e0 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr_regs.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr_regs.h
> > > @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@
> > > #define
> > > EDP_PSR_MIN_LINK_ENTRY_TIME_0_LINES
> > > REG_FIELD_PREP(EDP_PSR_MIN_LINK_ ENTRY_TIME_MASK, 3)
> > > #define EDP_PSR_MAX_SLEEP_TIME_MASK REG_GENMASK(24, 20)
> > > #define
> > > EDP_PSR_MAX_SLEEP_TIME(x)
> > > REG_FIELD_PREP(EDP_PSR_MAX_SLEEP _TIME_MASK, (x))
> > > +#define LNL_EDP_PSR_ENTRY_SETUP_FRAMES_MASK REG_GENMASK(17, 16)
> > > +#define
> > > LNL_EDP_PSR_ENTRY_SETUP_FRAMES(x)
> > > REG_FIELD_PREP(LNL_EDP_PSR_ENTRY _SETUP_FRAMES_MASK, (x))
> > > #define EDP_PSR_SKIP_AUX_EXIT REG_BIT(12)
> > > #define EDP_PSR_TP_MASK REG_BIT(11)
> > > #define
> > > EDP_PSR_TP_TP1_TP2 REG_FIELD_PREP(EDP_PSR_TP_MASK,
> > > 0)
> >
>
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list