[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 1/2] drm/i915/xe2lpd: check selective fetch is optimal in some cases
Vinod Govindapillai
vinod.govindapillai at intel.com
Thu Nov 2 21:55:18 UTC 2023
If both PSR2 + FBC is supported, in cases where the selective
fetch area is greater than 25% of the screen area, FBC might
be more efficient. So have a possibility to check this and add
provision to enable FBC in such cases.
Bspec: 68881
Signed-off-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai at intel.com>
---
.../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++---
2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
index 047fe3f8905a..bcc5fd8d8a00 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
@@ -1207,6 +1207,7 @@ struct intel_crtc_state {
bool has_psr;
bool has_psr2;
bool enable_psr2_sel_fetch;
+ bool full_frame_fetch;
bool req_psr2_sdp_prior_scanline;
bool wm_level_disabled;
u32 dc3co_exitline;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
index ecd24a0b86cb..6cb32fd29d10 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
@@ -1987,10 +1987,35 @@ static bool psr2_sel_fetch_pipe_state_supported(const struct intel_crtc_state *c
return true;
}
+/*
+ * Check selective fetch is optimum
+ *
+ * Compare selective fetch area w.r.t screen size in case both FBC and PSR2
+ * is supported. If the selective fetch area is more than 25% of screen
+ * size, FBC is might be more efficient than PSR2. So force full frame
+ * update.
+ */
+static bool psr2_sel_fetch_not_optimal(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
+ struct drm_rect *sel_fetch,
+ struct drm_rect *src)
+{
+ int screen_area, selfetch_area;
+
+ /* This is needed where FBC + PSR can be supported */
+ if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) < 20 || !i915->display.params.enable_fbc ||
+ !HAS_FBC(i915))
+ return false;
+
+ selfetch_area = drm_rect_height(sel_fetch) * drm_rect_width(sel_fetch);
+ screen_area = drm_rect_height(src) * drm_rect_width(src);
+
+ return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(screen_area, selfetch_area) <= 4;
+}
+
int intel_psr2_sel_fetch_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
struct intel_crtc *crtc)
{
- struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
+ struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(state->base.dev);
struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state = intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
struct drm_rect pipe_clip = { .x1 = 0, .y1 = -1, .x2 = INT_MAX, .y2 = -1 };
struct intel_plane_state *new_plane_state, *old_plane_state;
@@ -2082,7 +2107,7 @@ int intel_psr2_sel_fetch_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
* calculation for those.
*/
if (pipe_clip.y1 == -1) {
- drm_info_once(&dev_priv->drm,
+ drm_info_once(&i915->drm,
"Selective fetch area calculation failed in pipe %c\n",
pipe_name(crtc->pipe));
full_update = true;
@@ -2092,9 +2117,9 @@ int intel_psr2_sel_fetch_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
goto skip_sel_fetch_set_loop;
/* Wa_14014971492 */
- if ((IS_DISPLAY_IP_STEP(dev_priv, IP_VER(14, 0), STEP_A0, STEP_B0) ||
- IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv) || IS_TIGERLAKE(dev_priv)) &&
- crtc_state->splitter.enable)
+ if ((IS_DISPLAY_IP_STEP(i915, IP_VER(14, 0), STEP_A0, STEP_B0) ||
+ IS_ALDERLAKE_P(i915) || IS_TIGERLAKE(i915)) &&
+ crtc_state->splitter.enable)
pipe_clip.y1 = 0;
ret = drm_atomic_add_affected_planes(&state->base, &crtc->base);
@@ -2149,7 +2174,14 @@ int intel_psr2_sel_fetch_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
}
}
+ if (full_update)
+ goto skip_sel_fetch_set_loop;
+
+ full_update = psr2_sel_fetch_not_optimal(i915, &pipe_clip,
+ &crtc_state->pipe_src);
+
skip_sel_fetch_set_loop:
+ crtc_state->full_frame_fetch = full_update;
psr2_man_trk_ctl_calc(crtc_state, &pipe_clip, full_update);
return 0;
}
--
2.34.1
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list