[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/9] tests/i915/drm_fdinfo: Stress test context close versus fdinfo reads
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Mon Nov 6 12:38:45 UTC 2023
On 03/11/2023 18:32, Kamil Konieczny wrote:
> Hi Tvrtko,
> On 2023-10-12 at 09:15:40 +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
>>
>> A short smoke tests to exercise fdinfo reads in parallel to contexts
>> getting created and destroyed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
>> ---
>> tests/intel/drm_fdinfo.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/intel/drm_fdinfo.c b/tests/intel/drm_fdinfo.c
>> index 344c44dce78b..c4218b0d16e6 100644
>> --- a/tests/intel/drm_fdinfo.c
>> +++ b/tests/intel/drm_fdinfo.c
>> @@ -22,11 +22,14 @@
>> *
>> */
>>
>> +#include <fcntl.h>
>> +
>> #include "igt.h"
>> #include "igt_core.h"
>> #include "igt_device.h"
>> #include "igt_drm_fdinfo.h"
>> #include "i915/gem.h"
>> +#include "i915/gem_create.h"
>> #include "i915/gem_vm.h"
>> #include "intel_ctx.h"
>> /**
>> @@ -72,6 +75,8 @@
>> * SUBTEST: virtual-busy-idle-all
>> *
>> * SUBTEST: virtual-idle
>> + *
>> + * SUBTEST: context-close-stress
>> */
>>
>> IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Test the i915 drm fdinfo data");
>> @@ -717,6 +722,56 @@ virtual_all(int i915, const intel_ctx_cfg_t *base_cfg, unsigned int flags)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> +static void stress_context_close(int i915)
>> +{
>> + const uint32_t bbe = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END;
>> + struct igt_helper_process reader = { };
>> + struct drm_client_fdinfo info;
>> + uint32_t batch;
>> + int dir, ret;
>> + char buf[64];
>> +
>> + ret = snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%u", i915);
>> + igt_assert(ret > 0 && ret < sizeof(buf));
>> +
>> + dir = open("/proc/self/fdinfo", O_DIRECTORY | O_RDONLY);
>> + igt_assert_fd(dir);
>> +
>> + memset(&info, 0, sizeof(info));
>> + ret = __igt_parse_drm_fdinfo(dir, buf, &info, NULL, 0, NULL, 0);
>> + igt_assert(ret > 0);
>
> You repeat this pattern later, it can be made into
> function:
>
> igt_parse_drm_fdinfo(dir, buf, *info, p1, i1, p2, i2)
> {
> memset(info, 0, sizeof(*info));
> ret = __igt_parse_drm_fdinfo(dir, buf, info, p1, i1, p2, i2);
> igt_assert(ret > 0);
> }
>
>> + igt_require(info.num_regions);
>> +
>> + batch = gem_create(i915, 4096);
>> + gem_write(i915, batch, 0, &bbe, sizeof(bbe));
>> +
>> + igt_fork_helper(&reader) {
>> + for (;;) {
>> + memset(&info, 0, sizeof(info));
>> + ret = __igt_parse_drm_fdinfo(dir, buf, &info,
>> + NULL, 0, NULL, 0);
>> + igt_assert(ret > 0);
>
> Here you repeat this.
>
> With or without makeing this a function,
> Reviewed-by: Kamil Konieczny <kamil.konieczny at linux.intel.com>
Thanks Kamil!
I opted to keep it as is to avoid having to come with a name for a new
helper, and because it is only two instances.
Doing another CI pass on both IGT and i915 series and fingers crossed it
is still all healthy.
Regards,
Tvrtko
>
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + igt_until_timeout(10) {
>> + struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 obj = {
>> + .handle = batch,
>> + };
>> + struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 eb = {
>> + .buffers_ptr = to_user_pointer(&obj),
>> + .buffer_count = 1,
>> + };
>> +
>> + eb.rsvd1 = gem_context_create(i915);
>> + igt_assert(eb.rsvd1);
>> + gem_execbuf(i915, &eb);
>> + gem_context_destroy(i915, eb.rsvd1);
>> + }
>> +
>> + igt_stop_helper(&reader);
>> +}
>> +
>> #define test_each_engine(T, i915, ctx, e) \
>> igt_subtest_with_dynamic(T) for_each_ctx_engine(i915, ctx, e) \
>> igt_dynamic_f("%s", e->name)
>> @@ -848,6 +903,19 @@ igt_main
>> test_each_engine("isolation", i915, ctx, e)
>> single(i915, ctx, e, TEST_BUSY | TEST_ISOLATION);
>>
>> + igt_subtest_group {
>> + int newfd;
>> +
>> + igt_fixture
>> + newfd = drm_reopen_driver(i915);
>> +
>> + igt_subtest("context-close-stress")
>> + stress_context_close(newfd);
>> +
>> + igt_fixture
>> + drm_close_driver(newfd);
>> + }
>> +
>> igt_fixture {
>> intel_ctx_destroy(i915, ctx);
>> drm_close_driver(i915);
>> --
>> 2.39.2
>>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list