[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: do not clean GT table on error path

[Tvrtko Ursulin]

On 14/11/2023 09:48, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> The only task of intel_gt_release_all is to zero gt table. Calling
> it on error path prevents intel_gt_driver_late_release_all (called from
> i915_driver_late_release) to cleanup GTs, causing leakage.
> After i915_driver_late_release GT array is not used anymore so
> it does not need cleaning at all.
> 
> Sample leak report:
> 
> BUG i915_request (...): Objects remaining in i915_request on __kmem_cache_shutdown()
> ...
> Object 0xffff888113420040 @offset=64
> Allocated in __i915_request_create+0x75/0x610 [i915] age=18339 cpu=1 pid=1454
>   kmem_cache_alloc+0x25b/0x270
>   __i915_request_create+0x75/0x610 [i915]
>   i915_request_create+0x109/0x290 [i915]
>   __engines_record_defaults+0xca/0x440 [i915]
>   intel_gt_init+0x275/0x430 [i915]
>   i915_gem_init+0x135/0x2c0 [i915]
>   i915_driver_probe+0x8d1/0xdc0 [i915]
> 
> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8489
> Fixes: bec68cc9ea42d8 ("drm/i915: Prepare for multiple GTs")
> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda at intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c | 4 +---
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
> index 80e85cadb9a262..428ace0bebaac9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
> @@ -782,7 +782,7 @@ int i915_driver_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
>   
>   	ret = i915_driver_mmio_probe(i915);
>   	if (ret < 0)
> -		goto out_tiles_cleanup;
> +		goto out_runtime_pm_put;
>   
>   	ret = i915_driver_hw_probe(i915);
>   	if (ret < 0)
> @@ -842,8 +842,6 @@ int i915_driver_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
>   	i915_ggtt_driver_late_release(i915);
>   out_cleanup_mmio:
>   	i915_driver_mmio_release(i915);
> -out_tiles_cleanup:
> -	intel_gt_release_all(i915);

There is also a call on error path from intel_gt_probe_all. Shouldn't 
that also go?

At which points intel_gt_release_all will have no callers. Fold it into 
intel_gt_driver_late_release_all or don't bother zeroing?

Regards,

Tvrtko

>   out_runtime_pm_put:
>   	enable_rpm_wakeref_asserts(&i915->runtime_pm);
>   	i915_driver_late_release(i915);
> 
> ---
> base-commit: c6f47b4817ee55a02359c3347a298876cfa93b0e
> change-id: 20231114-dont_clean_gt_on_error_path-91cd9c3caa0a
> 
> Best regards,