[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/dsi: 4th attempt to get rid of IOSF GPIO (rev2)

[Saarinen, Jani]

Hi, 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Musial, Ewelina <ewelina.musial at intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2023 4:25 PM
> To: Saarinen, Jani <jani.saarinen at intel.com>; Jani Nikula
> <jani.nikula at linux.intel.com>; Illipilli, TejasreeX <tejasreex.illipilli at intel.com>;
> LGCI Bug Filing <lgci.bug.filing at intel.com>; Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/dsi: 4th attempt to get rid
> of IOSF GPIO (rev2)
> 
> But this list had only series which were in queue here https://intel-gfx-
> ci.01.org/queue/index.html and today I was checking exactly how queue for
> shards is created and there are jobs which are not displayed there. Directly in
> Jenkins we do have multiple more jobs than in this queue only and I also killed
> them. I was discussing exactly this case today with Michał and he pointed out that
> in explanation below queues we do have highlighted:
> Due to technical limitation this is just an approximation of the queue. It is good
> for assessing the length of the queue, but should not be considered as
> completely accurate.
OK. So could have been in the list but not sure. 
> 
> Regards,
> Ewelina
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Saarinen, Jani <jani.saarinen at intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2023 3:04 PM
> To: Musial, Ewelina <ewelina.musial at intel.com>; Jani Nikula
> <jani.nikula at linux.intel.com>; Illipilli, TejasreeX <tejasreex.illipilli at intel.com>;
> LGCI Bug Filing <lgci.bug.filing at intel.com>; Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/dsi: 4th attempt to get rid
> of IOSF GPIO (rev2)
> 
> HI,
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of
> > Musial, Ewelina
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2023 3:39 PM
> > To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at linux.intel.com>; Illipilli, TejasreeX
> > <tejasreex.illipilli at intel.com>; LGCI Bug Filing
> > <lgci.bug.filing at intel.com>; Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/dsi: 4th
> > attempt to get rid of IOSF GPIO (rev2)
> >
> > Hi, I reviewed what I could, and my conclusion is that CI.FULL for
> > this series was killed due to my work around 126526v6 - yesterday I
> > was asked to do whatever I can to speed up shards testing for
> > mentioned series and I killed multiple sessions which were higher in
> > queue. We do not have option to simply bump priority for premerge
> > series and the only way (not recommended but sometimes needed) is to
> > drop everything what is higher. I've added this series back to queue.
> > Sorry for inconvenience
> Nope. It was not part of that list. We checked that with Jani too. See those
> pictures we discussed.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ewelina
> 
> Br,
> Jani S