[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/dsi: 4th attempt to get rid of IOSF GPIO (rev2)

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 12:55:05PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Nov 2023, "Illipilli, TejasreeX" <tejasreex.illipilli at intel.com> wrote:
> > Hi ,
> >
> > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/125977/
> 
> Thanks, I guess, but now what? There are no shards results but the
> series is not in the shards queue either [1].
> 
> I don't know what to do.

Tell me if anything I can help with.

To me sounds like CI doesn't like the series because of those checkpatch
warnings... But I'm not familiar at all with that, I might be very well
mistaken.

> [1] https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/queue/index.html#fullshards-queue

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at linux.intel.com> 
> > Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2023 10:29 PM
> > To: LGCI Bug Filing <lgci.bug.filing at intel.com>; Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/dsi: 4th attempt to get rid of IOSF GPIO (rev2)
> >
> > On Thu, 16 Nov 2023, Patchwork <patchwork at emeril.freedesktop.org> wrote:
> >> == Series Details ==
> >>
> >> Series: drm/i915/dsi: 4th attempt to get rid of IOSF GPIO (rev2)
> >> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/125977/
> >> State : failure
> >>
> >> == Summary ==
> >>
> >> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_13883 -> Patchwork_125977v2 
> >> ====================================================
> >>
> >> Summary
> >> -------
> >>
> >>   **FAILURE**
> >>
> >>   Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_125977v2 absolutely need to be
> >>   verified manually.
> >>   
> >>   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> >>   introduced in Patchwork_125977v2, please notify your bug team (lgci.bug.filing at intel.com) to allow them
> >>   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> >
> > The reported issue is unrelated to the series.
> >
> > Please consider adding
> >
> > Reply-To: lgci.bug.filing at intel.com
> >
> > message header to these status mails, so the right mail gets added automatically.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko