[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/dsi: 4th attempt to get rid of IOSF GPIO (rev2)

[Musial, Ewelina]

http://gfx-ci.igk.intel.com/cibuglog-ng/results/compare?from=CI_DRM_13901_full&to=Patchwork_126526v6_full&csrfmiddlewaretoken=LxQnwBlJ7BUCUML28uJEQTM1MHWEEflsGVkPmXKZuSrld9uiq4pf31pBdCHSixXD&query=

Comparison for your series - premerge testing completed before base build testing and report was not published automatically on PW

Regards,
Ewelina

-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com> 
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2023 6:30 PM
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at linux.intel.com>
Cc: Saarinen, Jani <jani.saarinen at intel.com>; Musial, Ewelina <ewelina.musial at intel.com>; Illipilli, TejasreeX <tejasreex.illipilli at intel.com>; LGCI Bug Filing <lgci.bug.filing at intel.com>; intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org; Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/dsi: 4th attempt to get rid of IOSF GPIO (rev2)

On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 07:17:48PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Nov 2023, "Saarinen, Jani" <jani.saarinen at intel.com> wrote:
> >> From: Musial, Ewelina <ewelina.musial at intel.com>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2023 4:25 PM

...

> >> But this list had only series which were in queue here 
> >> https://intel-gfx- ci.01.org/queue/index.html and today I was 
> >> checking exactly how queue for shards is created and there are jobs which are not displayed there.
> >> Directly in Jenkins we do have multiple more jobs than in this 
> >> queue only and I also killed them. I was discussing exactly this 
> >> case today with Michał and he pointed out that in explanation below 
> >> queues we do have
> >> highlighted: Due to technical limitation this is just an 
> >> approximation of the queue. It is good for assessing the length of 
> >> the queue, but should not be considered as completely accurate.

> > OK. So could have been in the list but not sure. 
> 
> Okay, timeout.
> 
> I just pushed the series. I trust Hans' testing here, considering the 
> likely platform impact of the series and CI coverage of said platforms.
> 
> Thanks for the patches and review.

Thank you, Jani, Hans, Ville and others!

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko