[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: Include the PLL name in the debug messages

[Ville Syrjala]

From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>

Make the log easier to parse by including the name of the PLL
in the debug prints regarding said PLL.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 39 ++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
index 0376adc36780..d86b02de2923 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
@@ -4469,25 +4469,25 @@ verify_single_dpll_state(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
 	u8 pipe_mask;
 	bool active;
 
-	drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "%s\n", pll->info->name);
-
 	active = intel_dpll_get_hw_state(i915, pll, &dpll_hw_state);
 
 	if (!(pll->info->flags & INTEL_DPLL_ALWAYS_ON)) {
 		I915_STATE_WARN(i915, !pll->on && pll->active_mask,
-				"pll in active use but not on in sw tracking\n");
+				"%s: pll in active use but not on in sw tracking\n",
+				pll->info->name);
 		I915_STATE_WARN(i915, pll->on && !pll->active_mask,
-				"pll is on but not used by any active pipe\n");
+				"%s: pll is on but not used by any active pipe\n",
+				pll->info->name);
 		I915_STATE_WARN(i915, pll->on != active,
-				"pll on state mismatch (expected %i, found %i)\n",
-				pll->on, active);
+				"%s: pll on state mismatch (expected %i, found %i)\n",
+				pll->info->name, pll->on, active);
 	}
 
 	if (!crtc) {
 		I915_STATE_WARN(i915,
 				pll->active_mask & ~pll->state.pipe_mask,
-				"more active pll users than references: 0x%x vs 0x%x\n",
-				pll->active_mask, pll->state.pipe_mask);
+				"%s: more active pll users than references: 0x%x vs 0x%x\n",
+				pll->info->name, pll->active_mask, pll->state.pipe_mask);
 
 		return;
 	}
@@ -4496,21 +4496,22 @@ verify_single_dpll_state(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
 
 	if (new_crtc_state->hw.active)
 		I915_STATE_WARN(i915, !(pll->active_mask & pipe_mask),
-				"pll active mismatch (expected pipe %c in active mask 0x%x)\n",
-				pipe_name(crtc->pipe), pll->active_mask);
+				"%s: pll active mismatch (expected pipe %c in active mask 0x%x)\n",
+				pll->info->name, pipe_name(crtc->pipe), pll->active_mask);
 	else
 		I915_STATE_WARN(i915, pll->active_mask & pipe_mask,
-				"pll active mismatch (didn't expect pipe %c in active mask 0x%x)\n",
-				pipe_name(crtc->pipe), pll->active_mask);
+				"%s: pll active mismatch (didn't expect pipe %c in active mask 0x%x)\n",
+				pll->info->name, pipe_name(crtc->pipe), pll->active_mask);
 
 	I915_STATE_WARN(i915, !(pll->state.pipe_mask & pipe_mask),
-			"pll enabled crtcs mismatch (expected 0x%x in 0x%x)\n",
-			pipe_mask, pll->state.pipe_mask);
+			"%s: pll enabled crtcs mismatch (expected 0x%x in 0x%x)\n",
+			pll->info->name, pipe_mask, pll->state.pipe_mask);
 
 	I915_STATE_WARN(i915,
 			pll->on && memcmp(&pll->state.hw_state, &dpll_hw_state,
 					  sizeof(dpll_hw_state)),
-			"pll hw state mismatch\n");
+			"%s: pll hw state mismatch\n",
+			pll->info->name);
 }
 
 void intel_shared_dpll_state_verify(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
@@ -4532,11 +4533,11 @@ void intel_shared_dpll_state_verify(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
 		struct intel_shared_dpll *pll = old_crtc_state->shared_dpll;
 
 		I915_STATE_WARN(i915, pll->active_mask & pipe_mask,
-				"pll active mismatch (didn't expect pipe %c in active mask (0x%x))\n",
-				pipe_name(crtc->pipe), pll->active_mask);
+				"%s: pll active mismatch (didn't expect pipe %c in active mask (0x%x))\n",
+				pll->info->name, pipe_name(crtc->pipe), pll->active_mask);
 		I915_STATE_WARN(i915, pll->state.pipe_mask & pipe_mask,
-				"pll enabled crtcs mismatch (found pipe %c in enabled mask (0x%x))\n",
-				pipe_name(crtc->pipe), pll->state.pipe_mask);
+				"%s: pll enabled crtcs mismatch (found pipe %c in enabled mask (0x%x))\n",
+				pll->info->name, pipe_name(crtc->pipe), pll->state.pipe_mask);
 	}
 }
 
-- 
2.41.0