[Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm: enable W=1 warnings by default across the subsystem

[Maxime Ripard]

Hi,

On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 10:52:17AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2023, Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz at amd.com> wrote:
> > Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan at kernel.org>
> >
> > On 11/29/23 13:12, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> At least the i915 and amd drivers enable a bunch more compiler warnings
> >> than the kernel defaults.
> >> 
> >> Extend the W=1 warnings to the entire drm subsystem by default. Use the
> >> copy-pasted warnings from scripts/Makefile.extrawarn with
> >> s/KBUILD_CFLAGS/subdir-ccflags-y/ to make it easier to compare and keep
> >> up with them in the future.
> >> 
> >> This is similar to the approach currently used in i915.
> >> 
> >> Some of the -Wextra warnings do need to be disabled, just like in
> >> Makefile.extrawarn, but take care to not disable them for W=2 or W=3
> >> builds, depending on the warning.
> >
> > I think this should go in after drm-misc-next has a clean build (for
> > COMPILE_TEST builds) with this patch applied. Otherwise, it will break a
> > lot of build configs.
> 
> Oh, I'm absolutely not suggesting this should be merged before known
> warnings have been addressed one way or another. Either by fixing them
> or by disabling said warning in driver local Makefiles, depending on the
> case.

I'm all for it, but yeah, we need some easy way to opt-in/opt-out. Some
drivers are pretty much unmaintained now and are likely to never fix
those warnings.

Maxime
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20231130/ddfb6cc0/attachment.sig>