[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/15] tty: Remove now superfluous sentinel element from ctl_table array
Christophe Leroy
christophe.leroy at csgroup.eu
Mon Oct 2 08:47:53 UTC 2023
Le 02/10/2023 à 10:17, Jiri Slaby a écrit :
> On 28. 09. 23, 15:21, Joel Granados via B4 Relay wrote:
>> From: Joel Granados <j.granados at samsung.com>
>>
>> This commit comes at the tail end of a greater effort to remove the
>> empty elements at the end of the ctl_table arrays (sentinels) which
>> will reduce the overall build time size of the kernel and run time
>> memory bloat by ~64 bytes per sentinel (further information Link :
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZO5Yx5JFogGi%2FcBo@bombadil.infradead.org/)
>>
>> Remove sentinel from tty_table
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Joel Granados <j.granados at samsung.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/tty/tty_io.c | 3 +--
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
>> index 8a94e5a43c6d..2f925dc54a20 100644
>> --- a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
>> +++ b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
>> @@ -3607,8 +3607,7 @@ static struct ctl_table tty_table[] = {
>> .proc_handler = proc_dointvec,
>> .extra1 = SYSCTL_ZERO,
>> .extra2 = SYSCTL_ONE,
>> - },
>> - { }
>> + }
>
> Why to remove the comma? One would need to add one when adding a new entry?
Does it make any difference at all ?
In one case you have:
@xxxx
something old,
},
+ {
+ something new,
+ },
}
In the other case you have:
@xxxx
something old,
+ },
+ {
+ something new,
}
}
Christophe
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list