[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/12] drm/i915: Simplify watermark state checker calling convention
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Wed Oct 4 17:18:58 UTC 2023
On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 07:57:08PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Oct 2023, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> >
> > There is never any reason to pass in both the crtc and its state
> > as one can always dig out the crtc from its state.
>
> I'm wondering whether we shouldn't just always pass
>
> struct intel_atomic_state *state, struct intel_crtc *crtc
>
> to the checker, everywhere, even if that's excessive in some cases. I
> think some of the confusion you're fixing in this series comes from
> people cargo culting the conventions, and then adding some new
> parameters as needed, deviating from the state, crtc pair.
Yeah, I guess that makes sense. I can respin with that.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_verify.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c | 4 ++--
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.h | 3 +--
> > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_verify.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_verify.c
> > index 47d45ba1e707..bbee79aad0cd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_verify.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_verify.c
> > @@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ void intel_modeset_verify_crtc(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> > !intel_crtc_needs_fastset(new_crtc_state))
> > return;
> >
> > - intel_wm_state_verify(crtc, new_crtc_state);
> > + intel_wm_state_verify(new_crtc_state);
> > verify_connector_state(state, crtc);
> > verify_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> > intel_shared_dpll_state_verify(state, crtc);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> > index d51cf92c96ae..e7a9fb4b1f6b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> > @@ -3134,9 +3134,9 @@ static void skl_wm_get_hw_state_and_sanitize(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> > skl_wm_sanitize(i915);
> > }
> >
> > -void intel_wm_state_verify(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> > - const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state)
> > +void intel_wm_state_verify(const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state)
> > {
> > + struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(new_crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> > struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> > struct skl_hw_state {
> > struct skl_ddb_entry ddb[I915_MAX_PLANES];
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.h
> > index 18e4b0661cbb..ca4312bf7012 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.h
> > @@ -38,8 +38,7 @@ bool skl_ddb_allocation_overlaps(const struct skl_ddb_entry *ddb,
> > const struct skl_ddb_entry *entries,
> > int num_entries, int ignore_idx);
> >
> > -void intel_wm_state_verify(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> > - const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state);
> > +void intel_wm_state_verify(const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state);
> >
> > void skl_watermark_ipc_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
> > void skl_watermark_ipc_update(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list